Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's right, if your refresh rate or FPS are below 240 you spent money on the wrong parts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That wasn't his original argument.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The human eye can only see at 15 FPS tho

:marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok let's try to limit this discussion to those with the acuity of a 5-55 year old male, appreciate you tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

so 30 FPS? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

240 :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk 165hz is good for me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Stable 120+ is good enough, especially as you get older. I shoot for 240 because devs lately are terrible about max frametimes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah man I'm too fricking old for games that benefit from 240 hz.

I sold my gaming ultrawide and got a massive high resolution productivity one instead. Way better for work, and makes no difference for BG3 or whatever I'm likely to play these days anyway.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

True enough. That said half the games I play are older than my gf, so they definitely aren't built for these resolutions/rates anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.