Lil_Bro_Kong_Marcynever/began
Tay Tay's last viable egg as it cries out "Whyyyy didn't you fertilize meeee???" 7d ago#7708146
spent 0 currency on pings
>women who already weren't going to have children now still won't be having children, but as a protest
whatastorya/s/l
Necessity is the birthing person of invention.
ConchShell 7d ago#7709311
spent 0 currency on pings
they didn't run on taking away abortions, trump isn't even against abortions, that's only a small fraction of republican voters. starting from the extreme position if you're on the more powerful side of the negotiating table is a good tactic, trump has done this 1000 times in his life.
the end result will be a federal abortion law, that limits it to 14 weeks or so for frivolous abortions, and generous exceptions for serious medical reasons.
whatastorya/s/l
Necessity is the birthing person of invention.
ConchShell 7d ago#7709455
spent 0 currency on pings
the specific bill doesn't matter. if there a federal abortion law ends up getting passed it's gonna be a reasonable compromise. if it happens under trump the compromise will be slightly more strict than what would have been under harris (assuming harris had any interest in passing a federal law).
Not even 1/3 of the Republicans in the House have cosponsored it. Yet, it would need 2/3 of the entire House and then 2/3 of the entire Senate and then 3/4 of all the States to support in order to actually pass. This isn't a serious bill for the minority of House Republicans pushing it, it's just virtue signaling for them, and neither is it a serious bill for the Democrats who are fund raising off of it, it's just fear mongering for them. So, no, it's not going to hurt Republicans because the majority of them aren't supporting it and no one will remember it during the midterms.
whatastorya/s/l
Necessity is the birthing person of invention.
pizzashill 7d ago#7709291
spent 0 currency on pings
you seriously can't tell that this is a negotiation tactic? dems will demand a more pro-choice-y law, they'll start negotiating and (after the dems have made enough concessions on other topics) they'll meet somewhere that is as close as possible to what the rightmost 70% of the country find acceptable. the republicans are negotiating from a position of strength, the more extreme their initial demand, the more concessions they can get from the dems.
dems should have passed a federal law on abortion five decades ago, for five decades every legal expert has been telling them that roe v wade was a house of cards. they had plenty opportunties to do so, but they didn't do it because then single issue abortion voters wouldn't have a reason to vote blue no matter who anymore.
Ban introduced to Congress
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
its like how
@Sneedman is on a s*x strike until his country bans circumcision
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Best advice I've ever seen on TwoX
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
pushing this shit is a surefire way for chuds to get absolutely dunked in elections.
right now they've got a good thing going with poorly educated people thinking every awful thing they stand for isn't true.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
by that logic Drumpf/repubs should have lost in 24 bc scotus got rid of roe v wade
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no, because they convinced poorly educated people it was a state issue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Blumpf convinced them he was just de-federalozing the issue and not being heavy handed moral police. Which was smart. Immediately doing this isn't.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
ah, bc tricking the poorly educated only works the first time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's why they got fricked in 2022 bb
This is absolutely a losing issue for them just as immigration is a losing issue for dems.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hear you but they ran on taking away abortions and they won.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no they didn't lmao, they did absolutely everything they could do to pretend it was a state issue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Everyone else read between the lines.
Do you really think their are anti abortion people that only want the states to decide not the federal government?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
they didn't run on taking away abortions, trump isn't even against abortions, that's only a small fraction of republican voters. starting from the extreme position if you're on the more powerful side of the negotiating table is a good tactic, trump has done this 1000 times in his life.
the end result will be a federal abortion law, that limits it to 14 weeks or so for frivolous abortions, and generous exceptions for serious medical reasons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The end result will be this bill dying in committiee
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the specific bill doesn't matter. if there a federal abortion law ends up getting passed it's gonna be a reasonable compromise. if it happens under trump the compromise will be slightly more strict than what would have been under harris (assuming harris had any interest in passing a federal law).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Not even 1/3 of the Republicans in the House have cosponsored it. Yet, it would need 2/3 of the entire House and then 2/3 of the entire Senate and then 3/4 of all the States to support in order to actually pass. This isn't a serious bill for the minority of House Republicans pushing it, it's just virtue signaling for them, and neither is it a serious bill for the Democrats who are fund raising off of it, it's just fear mongering for them. So, no, it's not going to hurt Republicans because the majority of them aren't supporting it and no one will remember it during the midterms.
Edit: Oh, and like someone else said, they do this performative shit all the time. Here's one from 2023: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/464/text
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
you seriously can't tell that this is a negotiation tactic? dems will demand a more pro-choice-y law, they'll start negotiating and (after the dems have made enough concessions on other topics) they'll meet somewhere that is as close as possible to what the rightmost 70% of the country find acceptable. the republicans are negotiating from a position of strength, the more extreme their initial demand, the more concessions they can get from the dems.
dems should have passed a federal law on abortion five decades ago, for five decades every legal expert has been telling them that roe v wade was a house of cards. they had plenty opportunties to do so, but they didn't do it because then single issue abortion voters wouldn't have a reason to vote blue no matter who anymore.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Foids seething, federal employees seething, this has been an ideal first week.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Is this one of those bills that is introduced every year but never gets voted on?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
YOUR BODY, OUR CHOICE!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hahahahaha, you're in college and you still spend your time like this! This internet troll shit is for lonely 14 year olds, not adults.
Snapshots:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/722:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1icxsd9/federal_abortion_ban_introduced/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots321
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hoping the abortion ban passes and then the Supreme Court strikes it down except on federal property
Can you imagine the sneeding
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context