Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Will you concede even if we cheat?" And then trying to clutch pearls over the answer really could only happen in burgerland

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Republican candidates don't want to pre-emptively deny themselves the opportunity to piss and shid themselves over "muh stolen election" if they lose.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao republicans will claim cheating to any and all election losses.

Idk why anyone is pretending a single claim they make has any merit at all.

For fricks sake the one running for governor in california accidently released a concession speech saying benfords law jad proven fraud.

2 days before any votes were counted.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Isn't the easy answer to adopt proper election security so that cheating wouldn't be so trivial?

Oh, wait, the Dems don't want to do that for some reason. It's almost as if they benefit from the current setup even if it leaves security flaws.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neighbor the dems have tried to pass election reform bills numerous times and repubs shut it down.

The only real "security flaws" are the ones they themselves have manufactured.

People with valid arguments for fraud do not repeatedly lie about fraud and make random incoherent bullshit about "benfords" law up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, the Dems idea of "election reform" tends to be little more than thinly veiled vote rigging. If your support for security measures is conditional on it giving you an advantage in the polls, you're not really interested in security.

The problem with fraud accusations is that it tends to go like this:

>Poll watchers say they were escorted out and a bunch of votes had appeared when they were allowed back in.

>Fact check: FALSE - the guy running the count says they were given a coffee break and all the watchers are just mistaken.

>You will now be banned from social media for trying to post evidence, it's been deboonked!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dems claim Russian collusion for any losses lmaoo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a lie. No amount of unhinged and absurd both siderism is gonna work my friend.

The mask is off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like I have said before, there’s no both siderism here. Democrats threw doubt into election integrity AND blamed one of our two biggest geopolitical rivals for colluding/straight up giving the election to Trump. There were dozens of elected Democrats claiming “Russians had elected this president” AND partisans in the FBI, CIA, and other agencies continuously leaked and even started investigations into Trump campaign officials based on this narrative. It’s not even a contest. For democracy, the Dems are unequivocally worse.

Dems shid and piss about a phone call when it was the current thing, now they’ve moved on #lockhimup for “stealing documents” because that’s the current thing. Meanwhile, ignoring the wiretaps and FISA warrants approved on the Trump campaign garner no mention. Unbelievable hypocrisy as always

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You wilk never convince anyone with an above room temp IQ that dems have done anything close to 2020.

The both siderism isn't working anymore, the mask is off. Conservatives better come up with a new gimmick. Even the r-slurred suburbanites aren't buying it anymore.

I also love how you tards try to start the timeline in 2016 as if republicans haven't been manufacturing claims of fraud for 40 years.

A sitting president tried to steal an election. Over 150 house republicans voted to allow him to do so.

Mask off, r-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not sure why u can’t seem to read, but this isn’t both siderism. Gotta wake up early tomorrow so I’m going to use your own tactics against you.

You have one response to prove that the real world consequences of what Rethuglikkkans did in 2020 were worse than what Dems did in 2016. Large parts of elected officials and voters believed, at different times, that the election had been stolen, but what Dems did in 2016-2020 was totally eradicate our soft power against Russia(this broken shithole totally controls our entire election system!!!!) and further frick up/politicize our intelligence agencies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Democrats should pay reparations to Russia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Muh jerrymandering lines!!

:marseyraging: :marseyraging: :marseyraging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Suck my hanging chad, chud

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

“Will you concede if you THINK we cheat” is a lot more relevant because these buttholes will never admit they were wrong about anything ever

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why so? Is it because cheating is just accepted as a normal part of your culture, wherever tf you are from?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most other counties are capable of putting basic election security in place. Much of the US still effectively runs on an honor system.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So you're saying USA is more honorable? Nice of you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Will you accept the results of the election?

>Only if I win

:#gigachad2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

-both parties every election

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey if theoretically we printed an extra few hundred thousand blue ballots to 'fortify' the election you guys would concede, right?

:#marseyclintongarrison:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It really is the dumbest most loaded question and they just keep doing it and treating it as some sort of point of contention

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

America was never intended to be a direct democracy. The founders envisioned a system where electors would be the ultimate decided in who should hold office. Elections are just a big popularity contest that electors may take into consideration when casting their votes. Clearly one side in America is not playing fair, and whatever the good side needs to do in order to bring the evil doers under control is an ultimate good, even if the optics of it are a little messy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Darn right!

The extermination camps for chuds will be up momentarily

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Will Democrats in key battleground races accept the Dobbs decision?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Republitards will you accept you lost in a rigged system?

:#chadnocapy::#chadno:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.