Unable to load image

Stock Trade Ban for Congress Is Being Readied for Release in US House :marseystocksdown::marseystocksup:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-26/stock-trade-ban-for-congress-proposal-set-for-release-in-us-house

Senior House Democrats are poised to introduce long-promised legislation to restrict stock ownership and trading by members of Congress, senior government officials and Supreme Court justices.

The bill would apply to the spouses and dependent children of those officials, according to an outline sent to lawmaker offices last week by House Administration Chair Zoe Lofgren. The restrictions also cover “commodities, futures, cryptocurrency, and other similar investments,” according to the outline.

The legislation would require public officials to either divest current holdings or put them in a blind trust. Investments in mutual funds or other widely held investment funds and government bonds would be allowed.

The bill may be released as soon as Monday, according to a person familiar with the matter. It hasn’t been scheduled for a vote, though House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer has said it’s possible it could come to the floor this week in the middle of an already jam-packed schedule before lawmakers go on break ahead of the November midterm election.

While conservative Republicans and progressive Democrats alike have been clamoring for restrictions on stock trades by members of Congress to avoid conflicts of interest, legislation has been hung up by questions about how broad to make the ban and whether to include family members. A group of senators is working on their own version of the legislation and there’s little chance of Congress taking any final action before the midterms.

“I believe that a meaningful and effective plan to combat financial conflicts of interest could help restore the public’s faith and trust that our public servants act in the public interest,” Lofgren, a California Democrat, wrote in the notice to lawmakers, which was obtained by Bloomberg.

The current law doesn’t prohibit lawmakers from owning or trading individual securities, but it bans members of Congress from using nonpublic information available to them for personal benefit. It requires any transaction be disclosed within 45 days.

A New York Times analysis of disclosure forms published earlier this month found that from 2019 to 2021 almost 100 senators or representatives reported that they or an immediate family member traded a stock or other financial assets that had some overlap with issues before congressional committees on which they served.

Lofgren’s framework also would tighten disclosure requirements and increase penalties for violations.

One of the key points of debate has been whether to include family members in any ban on trading. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, made his fortune in real estate and venture capital and frequently draws attention for his stock trades. Pelosi in February gave her support to banning lawmakers from trading equities, a reversal of her earlier stance on the subject.

Another potential point of contention is applying the requirements to the Supreme Court. The Congressional Research Service in an April report said that Congress imposing a code of conduct on the judiciary would “raise an array of legal questions,” including whether it would violate the constitutional separation of powers.

Justices and lower court judges already file annual financial disclosures and are barred from participating in cases where there’s a direct conflict of interest. Despite that, the CRS report says that the Supreme Court has never directly addressed “whether Congress may subject Supreme Court Justices to financial reporting requirements or limitations upon the receipt of gifts.”

Will this legislation pass?

43
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make them live in Congressional rectories and convents and live like clergy except doing hard labor in the mines. They'll be so busy thinking about legislation as they mine coal that they won't have time to even think about buying stocks.

:#marseybongo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is how the founding fathers intended them to live.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In early drafts of the Constitution, Senate membership was determined by who had the most cows

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also turn them into eunuchs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pelosi is going to die before this passes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynotesglow#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think this might pass the house, Pelosi probably wouldn't let a vote on it happen unless she gets tons of pressure from constituents. IDK maybe the democrats realize they need a win and this might be it?

I think if you're a public servant you shouldn't have a private bank account. If the NSA is allowed to spy on me with impunity I should be allowed to see whatever politicians are doing with their money.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or they let it pass the house and die in the Senate so they can blame othersidecels all through the midterms and also still trade stocks

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One of the key points of debate has been whether to include family members in any ban on trading.

Yeah but even if they do, these people could easily find another mole to do their trades for them. Just because Pelosi is brazen enough to use her husband doesn’t mean that she can’t just do the same thing with a friend of hers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pelosi can’t easily get her gains from her friend like she can from her husband.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The current law doesn’t prohibit lawmakers from owning or trading individual securities, but it bans members of Congress from using nonpublic information available to them for personal benefit.

Weird how politicians don't get charged with insider trading. There's already laws in place that would stop this.

I know! Let's make another law that'll stop this! Surely this time it'll work!

:marseydead:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They hate Nancy because she is the greatest trader alive.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've read it and to put it simply: I'm disgusted by some of the text. And especially when it was revealed that the alt-right "drama" website was involved in the research, my suspicions came true. The text is nothing but smelling coming from some pretentious intellectual dark web teenager fan-fiction writer. Unfortunately.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.