https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63699786
The voting age should be 25, and there should be a requirement to own real estate at a minimum. Frick the kids in a metaphorical sense regarding their opinions, not in a literal sense.
- 16
- 33
Top Poster of the Day:
kaamrev
Current Registered Users: 26,405
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
/h/mnn LOG /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Live commit: cb8e331
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I saw this thread on /r/worldnews yesterday and there were a lot of people being attacked by angry zoomers for suggesting this may be bad.
If the sheep-shaggers do reduce the voting age to 16 then they deserve everything they get
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The youth are more in touch with climate change and acknowledge systemic oppression, chud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
16 is fine as long as the 16 year old in question is a white male landchad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Raise it to 25.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Let's make it 30 then
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Abolishing the rotten boroughs was a mistake.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That hill that got 2 electors with a population of 5 was all that held the British Empire together, smdh fricking libs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What an idiot! That hill didn't do shit! The British Empire was held together by the badass British soldiers, not some stupid hill!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bbbb reveals herself as a pleb, sad!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you can't tell the difference between "you're" and "your", maybe you're the pleb.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neither of us used the words "you're" or "your"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did you really just try to tell me how to use proper grammar? Clearly you're the one who is youusted.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why is it 16? Why is that the cut off, seems like everyone should be able to vote to protect democracy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's actually bringing the voting age in line with everything else in society. 16 is their age of majority/age of consent. It'd be like having the voting age be 21 in USA, the court said it's discriminatory so they have to lower it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is the dumbest thing I've heard since allowing children on the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm really curious to see the inner workings of a troll sometimes. The folks who painted the street did nothing wrong but you're coming in here trying to distract and call them out or delegitimize them somehow. Why? I think you're just trying to distract: BLM did something not illegal and might “look good” in this situation and folks like you can't let that be. Gotta detract or make it seem bad somehow. Am I close? If not, why join in with what you said, given it wasn't relevant to the article at all.
Snapshots:
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context