https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/politics/bush-trump-republican-civil-war
- 30
- 9
Now playing: DK Island Swing - Staff Credits Arrangement (Tropical Freeze).mp3
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 30,805
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
6. Be nice.
/h/mnn SETTINGS /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn LOG /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
An aberration is not something that changes or makes something into what it is today. It is temporary, small, unusual, not reflective of something's nature/character. The word you're looking for is departure.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How can you not comprehend what is being said to you.
The argument is Trump is an aberration, a departure from the character of the Republican party, that has then converted the Republican party to what it currently is.
Like idk if this is a gaslamp attempt or what, I used the word correctly.
This is the definition of aberration:
The argument is the "real Republican party" can take it back from Trump, which is dumb because Trump is not an aberration.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That makes sense, aberration and made the party what it is are still opposites. Your definition of aberration doesn't capture the full meaning of the word. You're a midwit that used a big word you don't fully understand.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I used the word completely correctly, you know that, this is your attempt to backpedal out of the dunking that just happened to you.
My use of the word was exactly correct - the idea is Trump is an aberration from Republican values, and the Real GOP can totally take it back.
My point is Trump was not an aberration (not a departure from Republican values) so their view is incorrect.
Maybe I can word this in a way a poorly educated person (you) can understand. The idea is the aberration of Trump captured the party and put in place Trumpism.
https://nytimes.com/2020/10/30/opinion/trump-presidents-history.html
https://auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2021/01/08/anne-salmond-trump-no-aberration.html
https://japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2017/02/07/commentary/world-commentary/uncomfortable-truth-trump-not-aberration/
https://theguardian.com/business/2021/jan/12/donald-trump-us-joe-biden
I can keep going if you want, but this should be enough to prove my use of the word was fine and you're just r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You used it incorrectly by equating it with "made the party what it is" an aberration cannot make something what it is, that is the opposite of an aberration is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Again, you have no idea what the word means. An aberration can be a deviation from the norm and have profound impacts on a climate or environment.
And again, I used it correctly because clearly the Republican establishment believes him to an aberration and Trumpism to be an aberration.
Stop embarrassing yourself and walk away. The Republican establishment clearly believes his movement within the party to be reversible and nothing more than a deviation.
My point is the current party is not a deviation and more in line with the real republican party.
Is English not your first language?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, that's not what aberration fully means. It's a large specific word that you're now somewhat using correctly after I've educated you, but in your first comment you equated it with "made the party what it is" and an aberration doesn't do that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit dude you are beyond poorly educated.
What I said in my first comment was saying the GOP establishment Trump and Trumpism are an aberration and the current mood of the Republican party (Trumpism) is an aberration.
The idea being Trumpism is a temporary deviation from Republican values.
English cannot be your first language.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No you equated aberration with "made the party what it is" and I called you an r-slur for doing so because those two things are opposite
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context