Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's always about states rights until the state makes rules they don't like. Should we start a list? I'll go first

Woman's reproductive rights

Marriage Equality.

Weed legality

Did I miss something? I don't remember any federal judges ruling that states with laws allowing same-s*x marriage or allowing for the legal sale of weed to be unconstitutional.

In fact I don't even remember any federal judges ruling that states that allowed abortion had to stop allowing abortion either.

:marseyhmmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rethuglicans hate state's rights, read the Dobbs V. Jackson majority's opinion:

Abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views. Some believe fervently that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion ends an innocent life. Others feel just as strongly that any regulation of abortion invades a woman's right to control her own body and prevents women from achieving full equality. Still others in a third group think that abortion should be allowed under some but not all circumstances, and those within this group hold a variety of views about the particular restrictions that should be imposed. For the first 185 years after the adoption of the Constitution, each State was permitted to address this issue in accordance with the views of its citizens. Then, in 1973, this Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113. Even though the Constitution makes no mention of abortion, the Court held that it confers a broad right to obtain one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rhey dont live in reality, jor do they have even a basic understanding of how laws work in the us.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>leftoid (lib) invents a rightoid position out of thin air so they can smugpost about it

>Rdrama is shocked

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The US has country wide gay marriage because of the supreme Court though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was legal in like 30 states before the court case and tbh there was no real legal justification to ban the civil marriage process. If the gays want to cuck themselves out of their property that's their decision

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Marriage Equality.

Does this mean they're pushing to prevent the husband from getting fricked in 90% of divorces?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.