Boomer cries to city council about rezoning

But at the same time...this can be considered either as ruthless development for the sake of helping out Big Business and their profit margins that promotes gentrification and pushes out the pre-existing (and often poor) community

Building any housing reducing the price of all housing. I'm not sure what's up with this bizarre reality some people live in where for some reason supply and demand applies to everything except housing. As for the monuments and history bit, I think a lot of places (especially in Europe) are already way, way too liberal on what gets to be considered to be protected that it wouldn't be a bad thing to cut it back a bit. If Black Sabbath played at a pub once then suddenly that building is never allowed to be destroyed or even extended without extra special permission from the planning authority

this can be considered either as ruthless development for the sake of helping out Big Business and their profit margins that promotes gentrification and pushes out the pre-existing (and often poor) community

Extremly based !neolibs

But at the same time...this can be considered either as ruthless development for the sake of helping out Big Business and their profit margins that promotes gentrification and pushes out the pre-existing (and often poor) community, or as an insidious way for certain (((individuals))) to tear down monuments and history for the sake of (((walkable cities))) where it's so dense and crowded that you are practically living in ze pod...depending on what wingcuck political views you may subscribe to.

Everything in this sentance is based