Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Huh, wonder why :marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TikTok

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Got-dang Chinamen

:#brainletmagatalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

noooo you have to read the news and stay informed to understand the current geopolitical and economic issues tha---

:#soycrytalking:

bored

:#gigachad4talking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The entire front page of /r/politics for the last year and a half has been dominated by news articles about Trump.

It's entirely exhausting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

thats because democracynis in danger! Dont you care?!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Democracy is in danger!!! :soysnooseethe: Same as it was in 2020, and 2008, and 2000, and 1992, and

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Try better part of a decade. I remember thinking in early 2016 " gee i wonder when they'll ditch trump and move onto the next guy to hate" and that was when a quarter of the posts were about how Ted Cruze was literal Hitler.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>media pushes out most annoying propaganda ever

oh no we gotta vote the way they want so i can get back to nancy grace

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

quick! someone with a reddit account post this to /r/journ*lism

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe @Redactor0 wouldn't be bored if they didn't cover the same fricking stories every day. It's been the Trump trials (which are pointless and won't even affect the election) and Gaza for the last 9 months. @Redactor0 think @Redactor0 might have seen the war in Sudan mentioned about 3 times without specifically searching for it, and that's been going on for years.

@Redactor0 stand with Israel even though @Redactor0 don't think they've ever had diplomatic relations with Sudan.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's going on at The Washington Post is some good drama, but of exactly the kind that makes people not trust the people telling them the news. They're hardly the only ones.

I feel like the vast majority of 'trusted news sources' managed to unequivocally expose how much they're trying to control what you know, but also say and believe, over the course of the last decade, with big bumps for Trump, Covid and BLM. Doesn't help that you can see in real time on Twitter the same journ*lists acting like they're the arbiters of the cool table in a high school film.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BLM was invented by the media, school shootings only happen because of the media, even Trump got elected because the media covered him so much. @Redactor0 is really fricking tired of these people having so much power but pretending they're just observing, not controlling what's happening.

@Redactor0 stand with Israel because at least they've still got Ha'aretz.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just 7% of Americans have "a great deal" of trust and confidence in the media, and 27% have "a fair amount." Meanwhile, 28% of U.S. adults say they do not have very much confidence and 38% have none at all in newspapers, TV and radio. Notably, this is the first time that the percentage of Americans with no trust at all in the media is higher than the percentage with a great deal or a fair amount combined.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/403166/americans-trust-media-remains-near-record-low.aspx

:#okandgigachad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sometimes @Redactor0 wonder if it's just @Redactor0 growing up, but no, @Redactor0 is pretty sure they really do suck way more than they did 20-30 years ago.

@Redactor0 stand with Israel.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe more explicitly partisan but their coverage of 9/11, Iraq and climate change to name a few off the top of my head would lead me to say no they've always been untrustworthy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sudan is a special case because people need to not know who is selling them arms and military support and that's almost guaranteed to come up if it gets news coverage.

Even Wikipedia notices and they deliberately avoid noticing things in such articles.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The :marseyairquotes: news has morphed into feeding wingcucks their daily red meat, so you either are one or it's nearly useless for average butt people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The news should be restricted to 15 minutes at 6pm and that's IT

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The boomers need 30 mins just for weather

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.