Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>The sperm donor met the boy when he was born

>continued to spend time with him regularly

>overnight stays.

>Only ever agreed to donate his sperm if there was a condition that he would always be involved in his son's life.

gotta admit that's pretty darn stupid

pretty stupid ruling as well

till I read this lmao

>The birth mother, who lost her parental rights, had wanted sole responsibility of the child.

>But the birth mother's ex-partner, who had turned her life around following the breakup, fought for shared responsibility with the sperm donor.

guess he wasn't stupid after all

>shared responsibility among the three adults

>or sole custody

:marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guarantee he'll have another kid with one of them and it won't be in-vitro.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.