!britbongs we should all keep ourselves safe together it would be really romantic and stuff
Not so interesting but as usual there's some c*nt repeating the:
men's numbers are higher because they choose more deadly methods
thing which is a half-truth at best. Foids' """attempts""" are less successful when they try overdosing with the same drug, because (a) foids are bad at maths and (b) they don't really want to die.
Edit:
Semi-related slapfights about who wants to die more are available in /r/science (the answer is moids):
https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1eycmot/suicide_risk_is_76_higher_for_female_doctors/
Best thread:
I didn't ask you to stalk me and prove a point. Please don't be creepy.
medical provider
!foidmoment !biofoids why are you like this? just say you're a fricking nurse wtf
Edit 2:
She isn't even a nurse she's a beautician or something:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This clown is a sarcastic, disingenuous individual, don't even waste your time responding to him. He's not courageous or intelligent enough to debate issues and theories in an honest, straightforward way, so he (?) hides behind his defense mechanisms… in this case, playing a sarcastic, incoherent punk/rebel who makes no sense (because he's not trying to). Seems he's trying to draw attention to himself, and discredit facts and opinions he doesn't like by belittling them, as opposed to refuting them or making rational counter-arguments like us adult folks. He reminds me of an annoying, 15 year-old little shit desperate for attention, but lacking the wisdom or life experience to say anything intelligent enough to actually contribute to the conversation, or be useful to anyone. Don't waste your time!! Hope that helps. 🙂
Snapshots:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2yjr48e4eo:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context