At this point, I'd even make a motion in the House of Commons, asking if we had the 'Trail of Tears', is preferable to the constant bitching about "settler" Canada.
How is that term not considered dehumanizing? With it being a term that has been casted as a negative term and thereby casts all non-Indians as being illegitimate
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And they're still not over losing to Europeans.
At this point, I'd even make a motion in the House of Commons, asking if we had the 'Trail of Tears', is preferable to the constant bitching about "settler" Canada.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is settler becoming common if Leafland?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's commonly used by shitlibs.
If there was a national referendum, then Injuns would be stripped of all privileges and excemptions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How is that term not considered dehumanizing? With it being a term that has been casted as a negative term and thereby casts all non-Indians as being illegitimate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those people want to dehumanize all white people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I liked the part where there were no bodies and mass graves and we're still supposed to believe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The academic, lawyer and NGO grifting doesn't want to end!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
(because there are none)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So real, it's illegal to question it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@Sphereserf3232 discuss
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
R-slurs who proposed this should be banned instead
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But there were mass graves?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Source?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can't provide a source for something that doesn't exist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So you admit that there were mass graves?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, because you admitted that were none
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/1gdbg1c/some_say_its_time_for_canada_to_criminalize/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context