"Our research shows mathematically that the overwhelming driver of that burst of inflation in 2022 was federal spending, not the supply chain," said Mark Kritzman, a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan.
I guess you missed the "it did not" part of that. And he didn't say it contributed a nominal 0.5%. He said it contributed 0.5% of the current inflation. So if inflation was at 1% he was saying it contributed 0.5% of that 1%, AKA 0.00005%
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He did?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're surprised that he's not an expert on macroeconomic trends?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I doubt he said there was 0% effect on inflation, yeah. I'm usually familiar with his talking points.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't, hes lying lol.
I said covid spending probably had some impact but it was always primarily a global supply chain issue, which it was.
anyone denying the supply chain issues in relation to the covid inflation is outright r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Revisionist history of your posting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ok r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ok r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You literally look like an r-slured FAS baby.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I am the truest !friendsofpizzashill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://rdrama.net/post/53011/people-of-r-drama/1565547#context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
is 0.5% 0%?
I still stand by spending being a fraction of inflation. you claimed it was the primary cause.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/federal-spending-was-responsible-2022-spike-inflation-research-shows
"Our research shows mathematically that the overwhelming driver of that burst of inflation in 2022 was federal spending, not the supply chain," said Mark Kritzman, a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
these people Trump the genral consensus, and if so, why?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just because you believe something doesn't mean it's the "general consensus"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"It did not"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that was in response to you claiming it was the primary cause of inflation you absolute neurodivergent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/federal-spending-was-responsible-2022-spike-inflation-research-shows
It was lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://rdrama.net/post/53011/people-of-r-drama/1565547#context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
.5% is significant in terms of inflation.
You are
and ![:marseypizzarentfree: :marseypizzarentfree:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseypizzarentfree.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I guess you missed the "it did not" part of that. And he didn't say it contributed a nominal 0.5%. He said it contributed 0.5% of the current inflation. So if inflation was at 1% he was saying it contributed 0.5% of that 1%, AKA 0.00005%
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No he didn't.. you even sperg out about how .5% is a significant amount.. the exact words I did![:marseygigathonk: :marseygigathonk:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseygigathonk.webp)
He also asked you where he said stimulus had 0 effect on inflation.. the exact words i did![:marseymindblown: :marseymindblown:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseymindblown.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context