If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) February 9, 2025
If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal.
Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power.
Burgers have an extremely r-slurred political system. If a PM in Canada actually tried the Burger "Ignore the courts", the House of Commons would force a non confidence vote, and they would likely lose it.
What's the point of the judiciary if one of the President's goons says "The President said so"?
MAGA cultists should be forced to pay a 300% tariff on everything.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So if a court said the military has to go around shooting random civilians, do you think the executive branch would have to obey just because a court said so? Some libshit on the court throwing a temper tantrum is not the same thing as a legitimate decision that needs to be heeded.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who defines what's legitimate?
Trump openly rejects the 14th amendment, even if the American plainly endorses birthright citizenship.
Then the Senate GOP unveils a BS amendment to restrict Supreme Court to 9 justices, and not repeal birthright citizenship from the constitution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The men with guns define what's legitimate. That's what government is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context