It’s another example of leftoids getting what they want by chipping away at second amendment rights. For them, ‘compromise’ means that they don’t get everything they want but most of it, instead of both sides getting something they want
it's really just plugging some r-slurred holes in existing laws
The reforms include:
Tougher background checks for buyers younger than 21
$15bn (£12.2bn) in federal funding for mental health programs and school security upgrades
Funding to encourage states to implement "red flag" laws to remove firearms from people considered a threat
Closing the so-called "boyfriend loophole" by banning all those convicted of domestic abuse from owning a gun - not just those who are married to their victims or live with them.
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
amazing how many pages I had to go through on the fox site to find anything other than "NEW GUN CONTROL LAW" not actually what it is.
When I finally get there, wow its completely reasonable and had bipartisan support
God I hate americans
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh cool. I wonder what subsection d and g of section 922 means!
Finally a proper punishment to anyone who sells a gun to duggie pot smokers, r-slurs and illegals.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It’s another example of leftoids getting what they want by chipping away at second amendment rights. For them, ‘compromise’ means that they don’t get everything they want but most of it, instead of both sides getting something they want
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's really just plugging some r-slurred holes in existing laws
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Encouraging states to push red flag laws is a big deal, it completley goes around due process.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
red flag laws are decided by a judge, there is due process
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I support gun rights for Americans because I want there to be less of you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eurotrash once again begging America for help again, this time for killing Americans. Do something yourself, Euroshitter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
care to fill a lazy bussy-connaiseur in on the details?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
have a decent source
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61938109
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
bussy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context