So here's the link to her video. Basically she says became a physicist back in the 90s filled with idealism, says she's against female only scholarships as she got one and 
her colleagues doubted her suitability due to that. Then she talks about how most of her job (and that of academic physicists in general) is limited to writing useless papers or using PhD and post Doc students to write said papers with your name in order to get more grants while being dissuaded from doing research in the fields you're interested at.
https://old.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/1bwn5vi/my_dream_died_and_now_im_here/
The reddit threads 
She's already done some sketchy vids in hot topics beyond her expertise.
Her vids about Trans people for example, in which she speaks about ROGD as though it's a real medical phenomenon.
TERFdom is a massive canary in the coalmine for influencers/commentators
At this point it's a great litmus test of guru-dom, whether or not they have an strong opinion on trans issues. It's like a pound shop version of the gurometer.
I predict that in the future she will 1.Talk worse about academia and academics 2.Talk more about american politics (fox news stuff) 3.At some point she will start simping for some capitalist
Sabine rapidly descending down the grifter pipeline
As long as she's talking about real science and doing it accurately, how is she a grifter? Because she accepts money from sponsors?
Aye, this one not so much! More the ones where she talks about… capitalism? And other topics she doesn't have expertise in
Yeah the capitalism video was quite stupid
Bonus on her capitalism video
https://old.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/16pdxot/sabine_is_wrong_again_capitalism_wouldve_killed/
Breadtubers DEBOOOONKING 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For anyone wondering who she is:
This is who wokies think isn't qualified to talk about capitalism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Tbf, its not that farfetched to be a top notch physicist and know nothing about economics and sociology.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's pretty farfetched to be a breadtuber and know anything about anything.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They know how to use garish lifx lighting and make 3 hour videos about problematic YA novels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I never said breadtubers knew anything about anything. The only thing theyre good for is getting converted to biofuel.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Obviously redditors know more
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah but (with the exception of contra) breadtube is people with no expertise opining on topics they have no experience in
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yes? STEM neurodivergents, ESPECIALLY physicists are not qualified to talk about ANYthing except their very very narrow field of expertise. Wake up to the STEM menace!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe I should've emphasised the breadtube part more. This is a community of college dropouts who've positioned themselves as authorities on every tenet of our economy/society....... Sabine says something they don't like and suddenly they're very concerned about credentials and official expertise. It's farcical. As an isolated statement what you're saying makes sense, but coming from them it's a punchline.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You would have a point if she wasn't a STEMlord they cannot be trusted it is better to be a social science dropout than a physicist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
STEMlord supremacy is coming.
You will not be spared
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I AM a STEMlord that's why I'm warning you I have inside information
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dumb it down even more because I don't even know what you're talking about or who this person is.
Like one sentence, a dozen words max. Please and thank you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She's a random physicist who realized it's much easier to get clout with "everyone else is wrong about everything" contrarianism than making it in academia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i don't think she's a contrarian. i like her videos a lot, she never sneers or gets smug, she's willing to evaluate new ideas with an open mind and doesn't seem to be afraid of getting ridiculed for it...but a lot of the time she decides the new ideas don't have a lot of evidence for them anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
???????? Are you r-slurred, smug sneering is literally her entire persona
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Thank you, Borpa-san.
I still don't understand, but thank you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wh*te woman bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context