Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The chud psychologist fears the they/them research critique :chudconcerned:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Peepeecels mogged by the pluralityhavers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Obviously the deydem will point out how reliable and replicable the theories are, which is a big no-no in the world of psychology science

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1716554362308813.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is that dolph lumpkin

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ruger Howitzer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The content of the emails was identical except the email signature was randomly assigned to include she/her, he/him, they/them, or no pronouns. The primary dependent variable was whether or not emails were responded to.

if you include any pronouns in an email signature you're either towing the line for corporate or an r-slur. we're addressing each other directly and have no need to use them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And if you put they/them specifically you've gone beyond just toeing the line

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hope im never dragged to it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In the future we will all be they them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Hello random stranger I am mentally ill and there's a 8% chance that in responding to me I will make r*pe accusations against you

Or you can simply not respond

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's basically a flag that says, "I have this specific bundle of political beliefs and I'm going to get extremely butt-blasted (and try to get you fired) if you don't."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love how just two years ago on rdrama dot net people were incredulous when I said corpos were starting to mandate email pronouns.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pronouns: Re/tard

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1716562547238014.webp

:hmph:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most people who use “they/them” pronouns are foids trying to be special aren't they?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The term is theyfab

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought it's deydem

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah it's blatant attention whoring. Oh I have a kitty but the word "she" makes me dysphoric for some reason! My gender identity switch got stuck in the middle, so now I conveniently have clout in my gay victimhood cult!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>people

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dudes rock :marseycool2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Men wanting to avoid drama.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As a member of the LGBTQ+ community (white woman), I expect what I'm due (your attention).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/sciencecels are noticing. The year of the linux desktop chud has arrived :chudsoy:. I didn't post some of the more :marseytransrentfree:, but /r/science :soysnoo4: is apparently now chuddier than me

Surprise! Academic paper with result supposedly proving bigotry in a scientific manner doesn't hold up to scrutiny.


This paper is not well done and the results are presented in a purposefully inflammatory way. People can be peepees and bigots. This work isn't actual strong evidence of that. Most of the responses here are just confirmation bias.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a supremely crappy study. The entire “effect” is random chance and p-hacking.

They sent <50 responses in each category, and used 6 categories, and the absolute difference in responses between the highest category and lowest is like 4.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The average they/them cute twinks are too subhumanly r-slurred to use scihub

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Male authors responded more to everyone compared to women should be the real title

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Four hundred and sixty-six authors (62.30% perceived as female identifying and 37.70% perceived as male identifying as coded by independent raters) of recently published empirical psychology articles were contacted with a request for a copy of their recent work.

They assumed the authors' genders :marseylaugh#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not going to actually read the study, but did they control for which pronouns were used? Like did the male authors respond to people with "he/him" pronouns in their email signature, or did they just spurn all pronoun-announcers en masse?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok so I'm not gay but I'm Swedish and have a fantasy where Germany win world war two and Sweden needs to export aryan twink boikitty slaves to high ranking SS officers for pleasure. I imagine I'm a shy little blonde twink with smooth pale skin and being brought into komedant heinrichs bedroom to give him pleasure. He is a tall broad shoulders kraut with a jawline that could cut a diamond and with massive daddy muscles and I'm a pathetic skinny little boikitty twink. He pulls me into his arms force kissing me and pressing my chest against his. He pins me down on the bed tearing my cute lil virgin panties off, he has waited for this for a long time. He teases my boikitty with his massive thicc German peepee and then he goes all in. Fricking me with a force I've never felt before. Every thrust makes him moan with pleasure. I love the fact I give him pleasure. He cums deep into my sissy swede guts, breeding my booty hole then he cuddles me with his strong masculine German arms until I fall asleep on his chest.

Any other straight guys have similar fantasies?

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1cz30wc/male_authors_of_psychology_papers_were_less:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.