Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The content of the emails was identical except the email signature was randomly assigned to include she/her, he/him, they/them, or no pronouns. The primary dependent variable was whether or not emails were responded to.

if you include any pronouns in an email signature you're either towing the line for corporate or an r-slur. we're addressing each other directly and have no need to use them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And if you put they/them specifically you've gone beyond just toeing the line

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Hello random stranger I am mentally ill and there's a 8% chance that in responding to me I will make r*pe accusations against you

Or you can simply not respond

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hope im never dragged to it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In the future we will all be they them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's basically a flag that says, "I have this specific bundle of political beliefs and I'm going to get extremely butt-blasted (and try to get you fired) if you don't."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love how just two years ago on rdrama dot net people were incredulous when I said corpos were starting to mandate email pronouns.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.