.webp?h=8 "Top Hat (black) - Traditional. Classy. Elegant.")
Dramatards where will you move?
North is the operative word here
51d latitude here, plenty of heat domes, floods, harsh freezes, massive forest fires. Canada and particularly further North is one of the areas hardest hit by climate change ... so far, lots of fresh water though. Yay.
That was true when the poles were frozen, I would venture to say that altitude is more important than longitude or latitude at this point.
Florida because climate change is illegal there.
Ahh nice refreshing waves coming through the neighbors old house, and to think of the property value now cause last year It wasn't beachfront property. I wonder what home insurance companies call the new increased fee's - wave liquification of property? annual sea level raise fee?
Florida dumb amerite? 
Can we make a distinction between "habitable" and "desirable?" Sure, it's possible to survive just about anywhere. That doesn't mean that, given the opportunity, people who live in places that are miserably cold, hot, humid, flood-prone, dry, etc. would not GTFO. My fear is that my property in a hot, dry place will be so undesirable in 20 years that I won't be able to afford to pack up and move someplace less depressing. Definitely a first-world problem! 6+ months of lethal heat outdoors, a failing electrical grid, and dwindling drinking water is grim.
Well, at least this one is more realistic
10 years, easily most, if not all of the northern US and Canada. Wouldn't put any bets on 2040 and beyond though...
Lmao, some people unironically believe the “world will end in 10 years”. Let's check his profile 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Climate change doomers unironically make me seethe. Yes, climate change is real. Yes, it's going to cause some pretty serious global upheaval over the next 80 years. No the world is not going to be uninhabitable by 2050. The biggest issue for most first world nations will be dealing with the climate refugees fleeing from areas that actually do become uninhabitable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
AI will either solve climate change by 2050 of kill us all. I can't be bothered by it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Heck in 2100 Michigan will be the climate equivalent of what Missouri is today. The US will be fine for the most part, like you said, it's gonna be the Sahel and places like that which will become uninhabitable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but what will Missouri be like in 2100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Missourable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
We'll all be dead by 2100 lol. Some of our zoomers may still be alive but too old and decrepit to care.
But here's a map
https://impactlab.org/map/#usmeas=absolute&usyear=1986-2005&gmeas=absolute&gyear=1986-2005
With different emissions scenarios.
RCP 8.5 is the worst case scenario, it implies continuous growth in CO2 emissions for the rest of the century. RCP 4.5 is the trajectory we are currently heading, though RCP 7 is not discarded.
!ifrickinglovescience
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!zoomers !metashit !followers me in 2124, the cybernetically augmented BWC Mk. VIII, posting WMAF racebait onto the Dramacorp™'s NeuroNet™ database, after the Cyberdrama™ code fused with President Aevann™'s cyberbrain™, in the White Male + Asian Female BWC breeding district in the cybercity of Neo-Tokyo™
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kino
The only constant… is racebait
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
blessing for !pnw cels (june might not be chilly)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'll be alive oldhead
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
What part of this is unclear
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Idk I live north of them. Generally the Midwest is going to get wetter along with hotter, though, so I will be farming rice in Iowa eventually.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it was a trick question, who gives a frick about missouri
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Who cares?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Climate change may be real. But to blame it on plant food sure seems like the dumbest claim possible. Any STEMcel who has ever done a simulation of anything can tell you that everything just suddenly explodes from a 5% error in calculation. Can't predict tomorrow's weather but climate in 50 years no problem
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, it's pretty r-slurred. !ifrickinglovescience Next they'll be telling me macroeconomists can predict the next bust.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Any STEMcel should know that predicting an individual trajectory of a chaotic system is infinitely harder (1) than predicting the probability distribution of states even far into the far future(2).
(1) the required accuracy of the model, and of the initial state, must increase exponentially with the desired length of time that's to be simulated.
(2) in an autonomous system that distribution converges for t->infty, and if the system is noisy (satisfying some mild assumptions) it is a smooth density which changes continuously under changes of the model (an epsilon error between the model and the actual system only leads to an O(epsilon) error in the predicted density), and finally what they're actually trying to predict is not even the probability distribution of states itself, but some quantities (e.g. temperature) averaged over that distribution, which are even less sensitive to model inaccuracy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
We just gotta invent robots and get the third world to wipe themselves out in the next 50 years then.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We need to start subsidizing video games there now
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just do some geo-engineering. It's simple and not hard and once we decide to do it all this discourse will look silly and dumb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That would actually solve the problem, though. They want to complain and use it as a cudgel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How else are we gonna force socialism on people?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just kill them. They're overbreeding as it is anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You know where else became uninhabitable? Pompeii and Krakatoa.
Solar activity look it up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context