I already know about:
and :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_human_evolution
I am also open to blackpill and redpill data. As long as it is true I want it.
Thanks.
Comment links and info.
I already know about:
and :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_human_evolution
I am also open to blackpill and redpill data. As long as it is true I want it.
Thanks.
Comment links and info.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neat. could you link me to a study or inform me about the conclusions reached?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no, it was a wjile ago. Just look up a few wikis about youll be aite
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You should explain this to me?
!slots100
Edit:
https://www.bonobos.org/post/bonoboschimpsandthecongoriver
Will this do?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
idk, it just shows how a simple geographical feature can seperate two very genetically similar life forms and despite rhe environment being pretty much the same, they end up evolhing totally differwntly over time. Kinda also help people understand that we didnt descend directlg from chimps or bonobos, just that theyre a common ancestor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neanderthals are our closest relatives. Chimps the second closest, and bonobos the third.
Chimps and bonobos are both on the verge of extinction and I think that's a good thing. Humans thrive by killing their closest neighbors they cannot assimilate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
maybe of it was just them, butt unfortunately all megafauna aside from humans are consistently dwcreasing in population with many becoming endagered, this is leading to a trophic cascade whichnis leading to multiple animal specieces and plant species also dying off. Werebin the midst of a mass extinction. Theres parts of rhe ocean completely devoid of even plankton, where there isnt even enpugh oxygen tp support life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If it's not killing off the humans then I don't see a problem.
World agricultural output increases at a rate of 2.3% year on year. World population increases at a rate of 0.8% and declining.
I like to believe that evolutionary bottlenecks are part of the evolutionary process.
You have the one successful group, mass spread, new bottleneck as new key player emerges, new evolutionary environment that develops around that new player.
I bet there was a time when there were like a million competitors to trees, then trees just dominated and now all life on Earth is based around the existence of trees.
One day maybe all life on Earth will be based around the existence of humans. We are already beginning to adopt a diverse group of animals as pets going beyond dogs and cats. Once pet diversity expands to a few thousand species things should be fine. Bottleneck followed by a new boom.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
sharks predate trees by 50million years. Both have existed for 400 million. Humans have in the last 50 years reduced all specieces of shark by over 70% with most becoming endagered..
all it will take is a plague like Ug99 to change that and then billions could die of famine bc were so dependent on agriculture. Also the diversity of those plants has greatly reduced due to agriculture making a plague/blight likely to be all the more devastating.
when there's no bugs and birds in the sky, theres no fish in the sea/rivers and you cant swim in them because theyre toxic, youll see that himans are also dying off along with most remaining life and then roaches/microbes will win this competition that youre so fond of.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Winning isn't a sin.
Increase food diversity and curing food crops capabilities using advanced AI.
Wrong.
Pigeons are prospering. Farmed fish are prospering. Water quality is safe enough to swim on most beaches still. Climate change reversal is actively being worked on. The holocene means most species die, not that every species dies.
Your statement is the equivalent of saying nukes can kill off all of humanity which they actually cannot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I looked it up.
My favorite part is how the bonobos are far more peaceful but also far closer to the verge of extinction.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context