Unable to load image

Could somebody link me to the best evolution experiments and discoveries out there?

I already know about:

and :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_human_evolution

I am also open to blackpill and redpill data. As long as it is true I want it.

Thanks.

Comment links and info.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://hackaday.io/project/160183-diy-dna-sequencer

Got me to read up on biohackers. i am surprised nothing truly significant has happened so far. Nobody just going around biohacking a new thumb or trying to cure themselves of some disease.

Edit:

Just realized one of the primary reasons the world is not filled with biohackers and people creating new viruses in their homes is because most humans aren't actually smart enough to do it. You would have to be in the top 0.01% of performers to be able to pull things off individually and even then you are being tracked and have to have the funds to develop things in your garage.

You don't have science fiction chaos in the world because most people aren't individually smart enough to pull it off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

because most humans aren't actually smart enough to do it

Totally. Currently mostly us :marseytrain: do it the most.

and have to have the funds to develop things in your garage

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Woman or woma'am?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17208141239292498.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseymuha#mmad:

why don't we have a marsey for the letter for Allah

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Interesting. Could you explain to me what it means?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So the map shows that different races do have a genetic basis to them but the race categorization as per racists is incorrect.

Isn't that already known for some time?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think comparing bonobos and chimpanzees on opposite sides of the congo river and their variances in speciation was interesting to learn about.

https://media.giphy.com/media/argm0JehakB2X64NgW/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neat. could you link me to a study or inform me about the conclusions reached?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no, it was a wjile ago. Just look up a few wikis about youll be aite

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You should explain this to me?

!slots100

Edit:

https://www.bonobos.org/post/bonoboschimpsandthecongoriver

Will this do?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

idk, it just shows how a simple geographical feature can seperate two very genetically similar life forms and despite rhe environment being pretty much the same, they end up evolhing totally differwntly over time. Kinda also help people understand that we didnt descend directlg from chimps or bonobos, just that theyre a common ancestor.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neanderthals are our closest relatives. Chimps the second closest, and bonobos the third.

Chimps and bonobos are both on the verge of extinction and I think that's a good thing. Humans thrive by killing their closest neighbors they cannot assimilate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

maybe of it was just them, butt unfortunately all megafauna aside from humans are consistently dwcreasing in population with many becoming endagered, this is leading to a trophic cascade whichnis leading to multiple animal specieces and plant species also dying off. Werebin the midst of a mass extinction. Theres parts of rhe ocean completely devoid of even plankton, where there isnt even enpugh oxygen tp support life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it's not killing off the humans then I don't see a problem.

World agricultural output increases at a rate of 2.3% year on year. World population increases at a rate of 0.8% and declining.

I like to believe that evolutionary bottlenecks are part of the evolutionary process.

You have the one successful group, mass spread, new bottleneck as new key player emerges, new evolutionary environment that develops around that new player.

I bet there was a time when there were like a million competitors to trees, then trees just dominated and now all life on Earth is based around the existence of trees.

One day maybe all life on Earth will be based around the existence of humans. We are already beginning to adopt a diverse group of animals as pets going beyond dogs and cats. Once pet diversity expands to a few thousand species things should be fine. Bottleneck followed by a new boom.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

trees

sharks predate trees by 50million years. Both have existed for 400 million. Humans have in the last 50 years reduced all specieces of shark by over 70% with most becoming endagered..

World agricultural output increases at a rate of 2.3% year on year

all it will take is a plague like Ug99 to change that and then billions could die of famine bc were so dependent on agriculture. Also the diversity of those plants has greatly reduced due to agriculture making a plague/blight likely to be all the more devastating.

it's not killing off the humans then I don't see a problem.

when there's no bugs and birds in the sky, theres no fish in the sea/rivers and you cant swim in them because theyre toxic, youll see that himans are also dying off along with most remaining life and then roaches/microbes will win this competition that youre so fond of.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

I looked it up.

My favorite part is how the bonobos are far more peaceful but also far closer to the verge of extinction.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Beauty-Darwins-Forgotten-Theory/dp/0385537212

Species do not grow more perfect: the weaker dominate the strong again and again - the reason being they are the great majority, and they are also cleverer.... Darwin forgot the mind (- that in English): the weak possess more mind. ... To acquire mind one must need mind - one loses it when one no longer needs it. He who possesses strength divests himself of mind

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I do not understand your last sentences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_game_theory

I think the beauty runaway effect makes sense, the counterargument I would make is that the most beautiful disconnected from survival success in the local environment runs the higher risk of dying out. That is, those with above average looks have a higher procreation and survival success rate than those with the most beauty in a survival based environment.

We don't see aesthetic only species out in the wild surviving very long unless the aesthetic criteria syncs up with survival criteria.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes I agree, the latter I quoted from Nietzsche who was critiquing that the will of a living being is to survive and spread its genes:

Physiologists should think before putting down the instinct of self-preservation as the cardinal instinct of an organic being. A living thing seeks above all to discharge its strength--life itself is will to power; self-preservation is only one of the indirect and most frequent results

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nietzsche who was critiquing that the will of a living being is to survive and spread its genes:

LGBTQ+ on suicide watch.

I like the quote you used. It makes sense to me.

I believe the winning move is to have 2-4 kids in life.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.