/h/nerdshit House Racist
nuclearshill gau/cho  2mo ago (image post) Edited 2mo ago 554 thread views #298972

Isaac Newton, the dramatard scientist? :marseymath: :marseyappleseed:

Unable to load image

>invented Calculus

>father of modern physics

>got into slap-fights with kraut mathematician (Yes, you stole Calculus from me Leibniz, even though I never showed my papers to anyone before you did :marseysmoothbrain:)

>got into petty fights with Robert Hooke

>sent people to the gallows for counterfeiting as Master of the Mint :marseyropeyourself2#:

>was into alchemy, wanted to create the philosopher's stone :marseyrowling:

>possibly an Arian, hated !catholics and believed the world is going to end in 2060 according to napkin Bible/Charlemagne math

>lost a fortune on a meme stock market investment

>died a virgin, claimed he was engaged once :#marseysurejan:

!historychads !physics what crazy stories you know about Newton?

61
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

was fricking into alchemy, wanted to create the fricking philosopher's stone

He succeeded. He's immortal. I saw him in a fricking Diary Queen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a minor pet peeve of mine.

Isaac Newton wasn't "doing alchemy" in the smoothbrain magical sense your divorced aunt is; Isaac Newton was trying to invent chemistry, he just didn't succeed (give him a break, you can't win them all).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

okay but the fricking point still stands

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it was much more supernatural than strict science

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you implying that trying to achieve a higher state of human vibration by letting the rays of a blood moon pass through an amethyst chalice containing the blood of a virgin castrati, a ray that is then focused by a convex lens into a single point of holy light onto the center location of a subject's third eye is somehow less valid science than a Renaissance-era volcel trying, but failing, to invent organic chemistry?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.