Study: exposure to poor people reduces support for redistribution among the rich.

https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1781312855540687295
104
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136061328573186.webp

God I fricking hate Paul Graham's bullshit midwit takes on everything. How does this support "the concept of luxury beliefs"? A: It doesn't, he's just mashing his stupid blue check fingers on the keyboard like the r-slur he is. Holy frick if only the tech industry didn't reward self-promoting white male mediocrity so handsomely...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyshesright:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is textbook luxury belief. If you're a rich socialist at university, you're like everyone else. If you're a rich socialist among poor, they'll try to guilt-trip you until you're either no socialist or not rich anymore.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagree: If you only believe in socialism as a luxury belief to look cool on twitter & bang lefty girls at redscarepod meetups, then you don't give a shit about actual existent poors, and you would never change your opinions after contact with them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like hating Paul Graham's twitter takes is a luxury belief

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyraging: it's not because

  • "luxury beliefs" is an ill-defined meme concept that midwits drop to sound smart, like "virtue signalling"

  • Hating on @paulg doesn't easily bring me status at no personal cost to myself (which I think is how Pauly G is using the phrase here, but it's rslurred because in this formulation the whole point is that the luxury belief has no correlation with realty - so it makes no fucking sense that being confronted with real world implications would change that belief. If anything, it's evidence of the exact opposite: That rich people really think redistribution is a good idea, until they see it isn't working. So it's not a 'luxury belief' for status purposes, but a sincere attempt to help their fellow humans.)

  • Neither is hating this smug prick an expensive, demonstrative handicap for me (like a peacock's tail), which is another way the phrase "luxury beliefs" is sometimes used. For example, elites can dabble in drug legalization and polyamory because they are wealthy with stable personal and professional lives so I can let my bull snort coke off my ass on Saturday night and still get my shit together for the OKR check-in on Monday morning, whereas the poors would be destroyed trying to live my lifestyle and believe the things I do. Maybe you could say that if I publicly took a swing at @paulg on Twitter with my real name and LinkedIn profile, then that would be a luxury belief because I'd be risking my career purely for spite (and to show I'm untouchable), but I'm actually not quite that rich or successful yet. :marseysoon:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!fellas Jimmy is seething at white male techbros again

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wish I stayed in tech just so I could make her seethe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

white womens' weakness is always strong independent nerds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Again? Always.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep it up bb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

even though ur a wh*ite :marseypuke: w*man :marseypuke: I stand with u seething at tech bros

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"luxury beliefs" is an ill-defined meme concept that midwits drop to sound smart, like "virtue signalling"

Luxury beliefs is a good and useful observation and its use by Silicon Valley r-slurs doesn't make it any less valid. :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

None of these words are in the Bible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

See, luxury beliefs are supposed to raise your status. This belief just gets me dunked on by longpostbot. :marseyitsover:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Many of them are, in the King James Version for example: an is used 2970 times. ill is used 14 times. that is used 89272 times. drop is used 11 times. to is used 60155 times. sound is used 71 times. smart is used 1 time. like is used 1168 times. virtue is used 3 times. hating is used 6 times. on is used 5259 times. easily is used 2 times. bring is used 634 times. me is used 3190 times. at is used 2814 times. no is used 3525 times. cost is used 1 time. myself is used 51 times. which is used 7540 times. I is used 32360 times. think is used 110 times. how is used 491 times. using is used 1 time. the is used 444952 times. here is used 92 times. but is used 10908 times. because is used 3105 times. in is used 22460 times. this is used 4548 times. whole is used 198 times. point is used 6 times. with is used 20800 times. so is used 4323 times. being is used 238 times. world is used 90 times. would is used 1164 times. change is used 18 times. if is used 2986 times. anything is used 4 times. evidence is used 5 times. of is used 30820 times. exact is used 6 times. rich is used 100 times. people is used 1044 times. a is used 43614 times. good is used 455 times. until is used 326 times. they is used 12784 times. see is used 431 times. working is used 11 times. not is used 10374 times. for is used 39735 times. purposes is used 3 times. sincere is used 1 time. help is used 83 times. their is used 3228 times. fellow is used 13 times. neither is used 721 times. tail is used 3 times. another is used 198 times. way is used 362 times. sometimes is used 3 times. used is used 18 times. example is used 4 times. can is used 410 times. wealthy is used 1 time. stable is used 1 time. lives is used 15 times. let is used 1392 times. my is used 22896 times. bull is used 2 times. off is used 323 times. butt is used 35 times. night is used 104 times. still is used 41 times. get is used 107 times. together is used 210 times. morning is used 82 times. whereas is used 30 times. destroyed is used 91 times. name is used 578 times. then is used 1982 times. purely is used once. quite is used 5 times. or is used 974 times. yet is used 609 times.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17035472185349927.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

smart is used 1 time

:taylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good bot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But how many of them are in the hebrew bible? :marseysmug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

youre a woman in tech, ur immune gofor it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like someone has a... luxury belief :soyjakanimeglasses:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy frick if only the tech industry didn't reward self-promoting white male mediocrity so handsomely...

...then it would be over run with self-promoting female mediocrity

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I just want all the money and glory to go where it rightfully should: to autists who can't give a TED talk or look another human being in the eye, not these VC pricks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They will lose half of it to the first Asian foid to smile at them thou:#marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can get behind that

But female autism is still fake.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My special interest is annoying people on niche websites. :marseyneko:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it shows

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseykneel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Take it up with the people who kicked out meritocracy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol assuming females can even reach mediocrity in tech. :marseysmughips:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Paul Graham is right about Lisp.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Paul Graham is so rslurred he invented his own custom Lisp dialect (not rslurred, plenty of autists make a hobby language for fun) and then tried to actually use it for his startups like an utter egomaniac. It's why the orange site never gets new features and still looks like it's from 2002.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>It's why the orange site never gets new features and still looks like it's from 2002.

Yeah but the orange site never getting updates and looking like it's from 2002 is a big part of what makes it good. Nowadays I'd expect it to be some SPA that requires 200 MB of JS to run despite not actually benefiting from being an SPA at all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is all true, and accidentally succeeding in spite of your rslurred decisions (and misinterpreting it as success from your idiocy) is very much on brand for him.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't understand why he didn't just make something like clojure so non r-slurred people can do it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Poverty isn't a refection of morale good, but neither are the poor inherently virtuous

One thing you'll realize when you live and work amongst the stifling poor in SA is how underperforming poor peeps can be, as how how very very little you'll poeple you'll find with the motivation to change their circumstances

In every class of school students ever, you'd always find a gradient of lazy unmotivated slobs and hardworking achievement addicts, who do you think tends to find the most financial success in adult life.

It is true that poverty can find anyone, I've also been without employment in life also, but the peeps who fallen on hard times and go to great lengths to work hard to ensure their children have a better future tend to be outnumbered by the laziest and worst peforming dregs of life by a factor of dozens

The drug addled and drunk, the lazy and stupid and malignant untrustworthy thieves. In a class of 100, it was completely unsurprizing to me which children had decent high paying careers post-school and whom were low-wage whites struggling as tellers or sweepers.

There were exceptions in terms of nepobabies failing upward with rich commercial farmer parents securing their underperforming moron kids decent jobs they didn't deserve, and there were hardcore working kids from poor as shit broken-homes who tragically didn't have the parents to help them pay for tertiary education and were white so could not obtain a bursary from the gov, life is unfair.

As a surveyor i have to physically walk and interact amongst the poorest people of society, so i see the naked face of many of the poorest, and how people are unmotivated to even clean the trash from their street or even their front yard.

I understand that hope tends to be for the middle-class, as they plan and act for a better tomorrow, while the poor tends to not see a future and that their every tomorrow will be a stifling one, thus snuffing the hope one needs to work and act as if for embetterment of tomorrow.

But ive also seen how the reality of the noble poor and how many of them are the architects of their own misery is a norm. I dont say this that i believe people deserve to live within the misery of SA levels of impoverishment no matter their work quality, but that laziness and bad intrinsic values have been a very real filter to people on society's economic ladder

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17053964397685544.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyawardr#etard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What I don't get is how thirdies can be so bad with money when there's actual risk of going hungry for them or other bad things happening. I get first world soys wasting money on funko pops and living week to week, because shit is safe here, but I'd be horrified and terrified to live week to week in Africa or India. They do it though, and more of them do it than the poors in the first world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Very few people actually starve in the "normal" third world countries.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Depends on the type of developing country, there's no one starving on Brazil, it has been like that since the 90s with a small dip on food insecurity in the Northeast during the pandemic because of food price hikes. I think starvation is limited to places dependent on subsistence farming followed by crop failure.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

when there's actual risk of going hungry for them or other bad things happening

Because it's not them who'll starve, it's some other sucker.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!peakpoors good essay

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136101230970013.webp

>takes out payday loan at 129% apr to by lotto tickets and cheap booze

>damm why the system keeping me down?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Denmark recently capped the APR at 700 %, there are entire shows about poor people taking out a payday loan and being endebted for the rest of their lives :marseyxd: before this

We recently allowed financial institutions to take it out of your paycheck directly lol, so many people seething that they are left with nothing at months end

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hate when r-slurs get ahold of publications.

The purpose of the paper was to understand why studies often find that wealthy people living among a high proportion of poor people are more inclined to support wealth distribution, while a different study found that wealthy people are less likely to support a petition related to income distribution when they merely see one person who looks poor walk by.

The findings indicate that the previous findings can be explained by self-selection (i.e. wealthy people intentionally moving into poorer neighborhoods), while the former can be explained by in-group out-group contact. It has literally nothing to do with 'luxury beliefs' or whatever, otherwise the majority of literature wouldn't have found that wealthy people in poorer neighborhoods are more likely to support income distribution.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it makes sense that poors showing up in a nice area where you don't expect to see them would make people more hostile, clearly they get too much already if they're showing up here and not even trying to look presentable

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I rented a room from a friend of mine's mom cause she couldn't afford the house since her mother passed away. The idea was I would stay until she could save $2000 for the inheritance attorney to switch the house into her name so she could sell it. She told me it would probably take roughly 1 year. I figured I would stay for 2 to make sure they got back up on their feet.

5 years later I realized they were never going to do this because they constantly blow their money on stupid shit and cripple themselves both physically and mentally with poor choices.

I moved out, the b-word screamed "YOU'RE FRICKING ME OVER!" when I told her I found an apartment. I gave the b-word 3 months notice I was getting an apartment.

Seriously frick poor people, they're poor from their own choices.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Obviously you're an r-slur to take 5 years to realise.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

u spent half a decade of ur precious youth

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I got peaked on poors after being a landchad. Poors bring every misfortune upon themselves and cannot be helped

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

hope you weren't in california, the law is super abusable there. basically the only safe option for landchadding is to rent exclusively to visiting academics on university mailing lists like my parents did.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Worse, I was in leafland. Was renting to welfare tenants because they get money from the gov for rent. They still shortchange you every fricking month. During covid the feds said welfare degens didn't have to pay rent or utilities anymore. The r-slurs spent all that money on booze and drugs and trashed the place. So I had to get rid of it, turned into a gigantic loss.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kind of like how exposure to blacks increases racism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And this is Danish poor. Now imagine going to a Philly and meeting the poor there.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, this is just the whole nogs of the nogs.

Even indians think dalits are below them, despite all of them being indians.

we have people too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The rich are the least likely to support redistribution to begin with. What is this supposed to prove? :marseybeanquestion:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.