I don't like my new lens :marseysadge: I also bought another new lens.

There's three issues. The first is that, unlike a zoom lens, it's always at 400mm - which, shouldn't really be a problem since I usually use the long-ends of zooms, but with, say, a 100-400 I could start out at 100 and zoom in while tracking the subject. With this it's in full telescope mode the whole time and it's really hard to match up what you see with the naked eye with what you see in the viewfinder. Will I get better with practice? Sure. Should I have bought the 100-400? Yes.

The second is the lack of in-lens image stabilization. I wanted to use it for video, but the in-body image stabilization isn't as effective as I thought it would be, and it still results in too shaky of an image. This is using a tripod with a fluid head. Should I have bought the 100-400? Yes, that one has in-lens image stabilization.

The smart thing to do would be to return/sell the 400mm prime, along with my 70-200/4LIS and buy the 100-400IS, but I am not a smart man. I also want to keep my 70-200/4LIS because it's the largest lens I can balance on my gimbal and that's really useful for shooting telephoto handheld.

So the second smartest thing to do would be to sell/return the 400mm prime, add another $600, and buy the 100-400IS. However, I still am not a smart man and I impulse bought a 24-70/4LIS instead last night.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740167189iXebECOQ6sRYOA.webp

That said, I do need a midrange-zoom walkaround lens for the documentary I'm working on, and the 24-70/4LIS fits that bill.

So at this point my plan is to hold onto the 400mm prime and see if I get used to it. I have a trip down to Kentucky next month and plan on shooting some horses and other wildlife with it while I'm in some relative warmth. Oh, which is the third issue. There's no wildlife out where I live right now because it's too darn cold. I could go to the airport and shoot planes taking off but that's boring and the chances of a cool plane crash are so slim it's not worth it.

I've also decided to hold onto the 16-35/4L IS because now I understand the limits of in-body stabilization and like the idea of having a well-rounded set of stabilized zooms.

Always, at this point I have the following lenses:

Primes:

EF 50mm f1.4

EF 85mm f1.8

EF 400mm f5.6L

Tilt-Shift:

TS-E 17mm f4L

TS-E 24mm f3.5L II

TS-E 45mm f2.8

TS-E 90mm f2.8

Regular Zooms:

EF 17-40 f4L

Stabilized Zooms:

EF 16-35 f4L IS

EF 24-70 f4L IS

EF 70-200 f4L IS

I'll probably sell the 17-40L, except that zoom is so light and smooth on it, I might want to use it for some documentary shots.

44
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyseizure: trying to understand spending more than minimum on equipment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

photography fell off after daguerreotypes imo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a sickness. I was afflicted with it when I was younger, but I managed to not go too far down the hole. As a filthy poor, I was happily only able to afford a limited amount of crack photography equipment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740168876HAjnBYX8PI8gOA.webp

RETVRN

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm well versed in the world of audiophile nonsense but never saw into the world of pictophiles. It's truly something.

:marseypi#pe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Difference is, you can actually measure differences with better photography equpment LOL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You seem like a rambler, which wouldn't be a bad thing if you were rambling about Madoka Magica.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's that one where the cute space cat takes magical girls on adventures fighting crime and making the world fundamentally happier, right?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're thinking of sailor moon.

!anime !weebs

laugh at him

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy frig. How far away are these raccoons?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OP smells bad, they stay pretty far

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've never actually heard someone not regret their purchase for those huge lenses

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Woot took that creepshot of the huge tittied woman last week and got a taste for his new prey. I'm not joking he has thought about her several times when looking for those lenses—he doesn't regret it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At least with expensive lenses you can understand and see the difference when you use them. With audiophiles it's all subconscious and subtle nonsense once you get past a certain price point in equipment (which can get ridiculously expensive keklmao)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just do what I'm doin and run a 70-200/2.8 II then toss on a TC. Sell the f/4 and big prime. Get's you the same focal length with a minor drop off in iq but with all the flexibility. The III has a slightly newer element coating but that's it. Would cover everything until you can afford an RF 100-500L or something.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey if you ever keep yourself safe, can I have a fricking bunch of money furst, b-word? If I kill myself, I'll let you have my money and guns.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was encouraging before but now I'm worried you might be r-slurred. Something as simple as this could have likely fixed your big issue with the 400mm.

https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/310367-3d-printed-dslr-hot-shoe-mounted-finder/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's neat. I'll see about getting one of those printed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269557146423938.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What an ugly cat.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just attach a cool looking red dot sight on top of it, kinda like they do with telescopes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagreefast: This is better

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740171097se-gRF_648x07Q.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I need this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Zenit Photosniper, if you ever actually seriously wanted to get one. Usually comes with a shitty film camera and 300mm lens!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how to get shot while wearing a press had and vest label

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I got really into camera in HS in 2016 and got one lens (EF 50mm 1.8)

got to use the schools bigass L lens for a day (cool :marseythumbsup2: )

and then I never really cared again :marseyembrace:

a 2006 rebel xti

it was 10 years old then, now its 19 :marseysad: still works though :marsey: 10 FREAKING MEGAPIXELS

anyway a bigass zoomed in prime lens sounds r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Selling a 70-200 would be a mistake without buying a better one. It's such a versatile lens. And now you have the 24-70 to compliment it. You can literally just use those for 90% of your non tilt shift stuff


Putting the :e: in spookie turkey merry new year donkey

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ιs thе whítе ļеnsе sоmе kínd оf víntаgе ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

L series lens, so we can let neighbors know we mean business and we got bread.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17401686443ZesHKm9RDERKA.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740170196VjIwmRh6H_pU3A.webp

:fancywithwine:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Canon makes their larger telephotos white in order to reflect heat from the sun and not be affected by thermal expansion. Does it actually work in real life? Maybe. It mostly signifies you've spent a lot of money on a lens.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh I thought it was just to flex lol.

Also yes buy the 100-400mm

Also that's an impressive lens list 🤑

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Give-a me one thousan dollars

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"if you fly over the state of Minnesota, youll be zooming over 38,000 people having intercourse." :marseysleeptight:

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota

https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-people-on-earth-are-having-s*x-at-any-given-moment/476182

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Haha babe look at this one it can zoom so darn far

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How's that 24mm f3.5? One of my favorite fl's.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's the sharpest, smoothest focusing lens I've ever used. I use it for 95% of my interior stuff. For exteriors too but I'm split with the 45/2.8.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.