There's three issues. The first is that, unlike a zoom lens, it's always at 400mm - which, shouldn't really be a problem since I usually use the long-ends of zooms, but with, say, a 100-400 I could start out at 100 and zoom in while tracking the subject. With this it's in full telescope mode the whole time and it's really hard to match up what you see with the naked eye with what you see in the viewfinder. Will I get better with practice? Sure. Should I have bought the 100-400? Yes.
The second is the lack of in-lens image stabilization. I wanted to use it for video, but the in-body image stabilization isn't as effective as I thought it would be, and it still results in too shaky of an image. This is using a tripod with a fluid head. Should I have bought the 100-400? Yes, that one has in-lens image stabilization.
The smart thing to do would be to return/sell the 400mm prime, along with my 70-200/4LIS and buy the 100-400IS, but I am not a smart man. I also want to keep my 70-200/4LIS because it's the largest lens I can balance on my gimbal and that's really useful for shooting telephoto handheld.
So the second smartest thing to do would be to sell/return the 400mm prime, add another $600, and buy the 100-400IS. However, I still am not a smart man and I impulse bought a 24-70/4LIS instead last night.
That said, I do need a midrange-zoom walkaround lens for the documentary I'm working on, and the 24-70/4LIS fits that bill.
So at this point my plan is to hold onto the 400mm prime and see if I get used to it. I have a trip down to Kentucky next month and plan on shooting some horses and other wildlife with it while I'm in some relative warmth. Oh, which is the third issue. There's no wildlife out where I live right now because it's too darn cold. I could go to the airport and shoot planes taking off but that's boring and the chances of a cool plane crash are so slim it's not worth it.
I've also decided to hold onto the 16-35/4L IS because now I understand the limits of in-body stabilization and like the idea of having a well-rounded set of stabilized zooms.
Always, at this point I have the following lenses:
Primes:
EF 50mm f1.4
EF 85mm f1.8
EF 400mm f5.6L
Tilt-Shift:
TS-E 17mm f4L
TS-E 24mm f3.5L II
TS-E 45mm f2.8
TS-E 90mm f2.8
Regular Zooms:
EF 17-40 f4L
Stabilized Zooms:
EF 16-35 f4L IS
EF 24-70 f4L IS
EF 70-200 f4L IS
I'll probably sell the 17-40L, except that zoom is so light and smooth on it, I might want to use it for some documentary shots.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
photography fell off after daguerreotypes imo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's a sickness. I was afflicted with it when I was younger, but I managed to not go too far down the hole. As a filthy poor, I was happily only able to afford a limited amount of
crackphotography equipmentJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
RETVRN
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm well versed in the world of audiophile nonsense but never saw into the world of pictophiles. It's truly something.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Difference is, you can actually measure differences with better photography equpment LOL
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You seem like a rambler, which wouldn't be a bad thing if you were rambling about Madoka Magica.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's that one where the cute space cat takes magical girls on adventures fighting crime and making the world fundamentally happier, right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're thinking of sailor moon.
!anime !weebs
laugh at him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Holy frig. How far away are these raccoons?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
OP smells bad, they stay pretty far
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I've never actually heard someone not regret their purchase for those huge lenses
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Woot took that creepshot of the huge tittied woman last week and got a taste for his new prey. I'm not joking he has thought about her several times when looking for those lenses—he doesn't regret it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At least with expensive lenses you can understand and see the difference when you use them. With audiophiles it's all subconscious and subtle nonsense once you get past a certain price point in equipment (which can get ridiculously expensive keklmao)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just do what I'm doin and run a 70-200/2.8 II then toss on a TC. Sell the f/4 and big prime. Get's you the same focal length with a minor drop off in iq but with all the flexibility. The III has a slightly newer element coating but that's it. Would cover everything until you can afford an RF 100-500L or something.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hey if you ever keep yourself safe, can I have a fricking bunch of money furst, b-word? If I kill myself, I'll let you have my money and guns.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I was encouraging before but now I'm worried you might be r-slurred. Something as simple as this could have likely fixed your big issue with the 400mm.
https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/310367-3d-printed-dslr-hot-shoe-mounted-finder/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's neat. I'll see about getting one of those printed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What an ugly cat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
just attach a cool looking red dot sight on top of it, kinda like they do with telescopes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I need this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Zenit Photosniper, if you ever actually seriously wanted to get one. Usually comes with a shitty film camera and 300mm lens!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
how to get shot while wearing a press had and vest label
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I got really into camera in HS in 2016 and got one lens (EF 50mm 1.8)
got to use the schools bigass L lens for a day (cool
)
and then I never really cared againdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05ade/05ade9b73e647a6d02096a8347bc96e3d9e64a53" alt=":marseyembrace: :marseyembrace:"
a 2006 rebel xti
it was 10 years old then, now its 19
still works though
10 FREAKING MEGAPIXELS
anyway a bigass zoomed in prime lens sounds r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Selling a 70-200 would be a mistake without buying a better one. It's such a versatile lens. And now you have the 24-70 to compliment it. You can literally just use those for 90% of your non tilt shift stuff
Putting the
in
spookieturkeymerrynew yeardonkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ιs thе whĂtе ļеnsе sĐľmе kĂnd Đľf vĂntĐ°gе ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
L series lens, so we can let neighbors know we mean business and we got bread.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Canon makes their larger telephotos white in order to reflect heat from the sun and not be affected by thermal expansion. Does it actually work in real life? Maybe. It mostly signifies you've spent a lot of money on a lens.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh I thought it was just to flex lol.
Also yes buy the 100-400mm
Also that's an impressive lens list 🤑
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Give-a me one thousan dollars
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"if you fly over the state of Minnesota, youll be zooming over 38,000 people having intercourse."data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61340/61340f4db997104b356e549a0ca900e3cabe03b6" alt=":marseysleeptight: :marseysleeptight:"
Sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota
https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-people-on-earth-are-having-s*x-at-any-given-moment/476182
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Haha babe look at this one it can zoom so darn far
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How's that 24mm f3.5? One of my favorite fl's.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's the sharpest, smoothest focusing lens I've ever used. I use it for 95% of my interior stuff. For exteriors too but I'm split with the 45/2.8.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context