/h/pol House Racist
J Deux/Rama  7mo ago (x.com) 706 thread views #264200

Alito just d*ck slapped :capynutpenisshadow: the gov re trump immunity

https://x.com/TM1Politics/status/1783525071362908393
40
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Does anyone have the video/audio? I don't really care what a maga flag wbs account has to say.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17121718107069042.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

SCOTUS cases aren't televised or recorded in any way. (it's to protect our heckin' democracy, chud, stfu)

The best they can do is literally send a tumblr artist in with a pen and paper to make horribly funny sketches of people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is demonstrably wrong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We got a few bangers out of them.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17140783191917787.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So I had to double-check, and it's not demonstrably wrong, but it seems they do allow audio recordings in addition to sketches. I didn't know that.

The Supreme Court of the United States does not allow cameras in the courtroom when the court is in session, a policy which is the subject of much debate.[1] Although the Court has never allowed cameras in its courtroom, it does make audiotapes of oral arguments and opinions available to the public.[2]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>it's not wrong if I change my claim

:marseygigaretardtalking#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>it's not wrong if i change my claim

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1714128842628418.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Here you go.

All SCOTUS cases are audio recorded, and transcripted.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol that nigga kept talking, he wasn't even speechless for a second

JUSTICE ALITO: Well, will that --
won't that give presidents an incentive to be
sure to pick an attorney general who can -- who
will reliably tell the president that it is
lawful to do whatever the president wants to do
if there's any possibly conceivable argument in
favor of it?
MR. DREEBEN: So I think the
constitutional structure protects against that
risk. The president nominates the attorney
general and the Senate provides advice and
consent.
And these are the sort of structural
checks that have operated for 200 years to
prevent the kind of abuses that my friend fears
going forward as a result of this
once-in-history prosecution.```
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LOL its a bullshit non-answer while he desperately flailed for a cogent response

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

missing the point. the gay rightoid grifter acted like he dropped his mouth open like an r-slur. he kept bloviating like one, but it was essentially without pause.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll ignore whatever points-missing I like :marseyindignant#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,734
sidebar image

1. No metadrama except in arbitrary circumstances.

2. Don't post in bad faith!

3. Try to be thought provoking, not provoking.

BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPS
/h/pol SETTINGS /h/pol LOG /h/pol MODS /h/pol EXILEES /h/pol FOLLOWERS /h/pol BLOCKERS
Current software version: 211520d
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.