/h/pol House Racist
J Deux/Rama  7mo ago (x.com) 705 thread views #264200

Alito just d*ck slapped :capynutpenisshadow: the gov re trump immunity

https://x.com/TM1Politics/status/1783525071362908393
40
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can someone who is more worldly than me explain this case to me?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rich guy had s*x with porn star, then arranges pay-off for her to keep her mouth shut. Because she's a whore, of course she can't keep it shut and tries extorting more money out of him by going public during his first presidential campaign. Now politically-motivated New York prosecutor is taking a case against him, not for paying off the hooker, but for paying her off from the wrong slush fund. Apparently this should have been a campaign expense not a private expense. Yeah, it makes no sense to me either, but it's got nothing to do with "breaking the law" and all to do with "you're in the wrong political party and we're going to stop you running against our guy by hook or by crook".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My shitlib friends were all over it recently (I think Donnie's is currently in hearings over it?) and they were saying he's accused of fraud. Is it actually fraud? You got any heckin' SOURCES? :marseynerd3: :soysnoo3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no that's probably the "we don't have a victim but he lied on paperwork to get a loan" case in new york

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pretty sure thats a different case, that's the NY trial that just started. The SCOTUS isn't involved in that, this is from the Biden Justice Dept trying to charge him with Jan 6th election interference shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is correct

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, I thought it was the NY one. There are so many cases going right now, anyone able to remind me how Georgia is going, after the DA and her snookums got outed?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commenters this is a good summary

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i dont remember signing up for this ping group

!slots399

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People are trying to arrest a politician for fricking a hooker. Which he probably did, but its kind of like he who is without sin cast the first stone

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they're going to try and convict "politicians who slept around while in office, out of office, and between being in office", they'll need to build three new jails, one with a wing just for Bill Clinton alone. Anthony Weiner is gonna need his own separate jail.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your supposed to drown the prostitutes in your knee-deep pool they were "paddle boarding" in at 3am, not pay them, Jesus

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought it was a chef

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's classier if they have a different job title.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Isnt the crux of the issue whether he used campaign funds to shut the hooker up?

!slots200

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Which, is still something poticians do. But really its about if paying off a hooker is a reportable campaign expense. Not where he paid from

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not where he paid from

wouldnt it matter whether he spent his own money or donor money meant for his campaign?

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Paying hush money for something that would hurt your campaign seems like a a reasonable campaign expense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Except this was after Access Hollywood is there something that would have hurt his campaign more than grab them by the kitty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no the heart of the charge is orangemanbad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots 100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots 200

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots 300

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots 400

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots 400

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The other replies are r-slurred and wrong. This isn't the hooker case this is about the January 6th one. Specifically how far does presidential immunity go, which would also effect the Florida, Georgia, and New York cases as well.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but those are all boring

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Please give the president immunity the short term lulz will be worth whatever harm that does to our country.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the zoomers in my workplace both laughed and declared, "bruh" when I sent them this LOL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It sounds like an argument about ineffective counsel in essence. If you go shoppi g for an attorney that tells you its ok to murder your b-word ex-wive, is that an absolute defense against the murder charge? No, and also the attorney is disincentivised from giving advice like that because it gets him disbarred and he loses his job and income forever.

Also, dodnt Trump pay the hooker before he was elected? Immunity seems completely irrelevant to the case because it doesn't concern his actions as POTUS but as a private citizen...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're using the fact that he was a president at the time to jump it from a state level offense to a federal level offense so they kind of have to take the good with the bad there. The state level offense already had its statute of limitations run out and the federal government declined to prosecute so they've got an attorney general who's being very creative

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How do they plan on pulling that off? You got any lawcel sources that aren't lawtuber-tier librags?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because hes trump so all the stops are pulled out

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:taysmart:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lawfare is not about convictions, but a conviction would be a nice W

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does anyone have the video/audio? I don't really care what a maga flag wbs account has to say.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17121718107069042.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Here you go.

All SCOTUS cases are audio recorded, and transcripted.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol that nigga kept talking, he wasn't even speechless for a second

JUSTICE ALITO: Well, will that --
won't that give presidents an incentive to be
sure to pick an attorney general who can -- who
will reliably tell the president that it is
lawful to do whatever the president wants to do
if there's any possibly conceivable argument in
favor of it?
MR. DREEBEN: So I think the
constitutional structure protects against that
risk. The president nominates the attorney
general and the Senate provides advice and
consent.
And these are the sort of structural
checks that have operated for 200 years to
prevent the kind of abuses that my friend fears
going forward as a result of this
once-in-history prosecution.```
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LOL its a bullshit non-answer while he desperately flailed for a cogent response

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

missing the point. the gay rightoid grifter acted like he dropped his mouth open like an r-slur. he kept bloviating like one, but it was essentially without pause.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll ignore whatever points-missing I like :marseyindignant#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

SCOTUS cases aren't televised or recorded in any way. (it's to protect our heckin' democracy, chud, stfu)

The best they can do is literally send a tumblr artist in with a pen and paper to make horribly funny sketches of people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is demonstrably wrong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We got a few bangers out of them.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17140783191917787.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So I had to double-check, and it's not demonstrably wrong, but it seems they do allow audio recordings in addition to sketches. I didn't know that.

The Supreme Court of the United States does not allow cameras in the courtroom when the court is in session, a policy which is the subject of much debate.[1] Although the Court has never allowed cameras in its courtroom, it does make audiotapes of oral arguments and opinions available to the public.[2]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>it's not wrong if I change my claim

:marseygigaretardtalking#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>it's not wrong if i change my claim

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1714128842628418.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game, and dumb enough to think it's important."

Snapshots:

https://x.com/TM1Politics/status/1783525071362908393:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,731
sidebar image

1. No metadrama except in arbitrary circumstances.

2. Don't post in bad faith!

3. Try to be thought provoking, not provoking.

BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPS
/h/pol SETTINGS /h/pol LOG /h/pol MODS /h/pol EXILEES /h/pol FOLLOWERS /h/pol BLOCKERS
Current software version: 07c7d74
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.