the gov re trump immunity
https://x.com/TM1Politics/status/1783525071362908393
JUST IN: Justice Alito just blew up the entire argument by the DOJ.
— 🇺🇸Travis Media Group🇺🇸 (@TM1Politics) April 25, 2024
Alito: "If the president gets advice from the attorney general, that something is lawful, is that an absolute defense?"
Dreeben: “yes”
Alito: “Wouldn’t the President just pick an AG who’ll let him do… pic.twitter.com/T2L7u29nZU
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can someone who is more worldly than me explain this case to me?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
People are trying to arrest a politician for fricking a hooker. Which he probably did, but its kind of like he who is without sin cast the first stone
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isnt the crux of the issue whether he used campaign funds to shut the hooker up?
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no the heart of the charge is orangemanbad
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Which, is still something poticians do. But really its about if paying off a hooker is a reportable campaign expense. Not where he paid from
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wouldnt it matter whether he spent his own money or donor money meant for his campaign?
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Paying hush money for something that would hurt your campaign seems like a a reasonable campaign expense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Except this was after Access Hollywood is there something that would have hurt his campaign more than grab them by the kitty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots 100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!slots 200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots 300
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots 400
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots 400
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If they're going to try and convict "politicians who slept around while in office, out of office, and between being in office", they'll need to build three new jails, one with a wing just for Bill Clinton alone. Anthony Weiner is gonna need his own separate jail.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Your supposed to drown the prostitutes in your knee-deep pool they were "paddle boarding" in at 3am, not pay them, Jesus
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I thought it was a chef
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's classier if they have a different job title.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Rich guy had s*x with porn star, then arranges pay-off for her to keep her mouth shut. Because she's a whore, of course she can't keep it shut and tries extorting more money out of him by going public during his first presidential campaign. Now politically-motivated New York prosecutor is taking a case against him, not for paying off the hooker, but for paying her off from the wrong slush fund. Apparently this should have been a campaign expense not a private expense. Yeah, it makes no sense to me either, but it's got nothing to do with "breaking the law" and all to do with "you're in the wrong political party and we're going to stop you running against our guy by hook or by crook".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My shitlib friends were all over it recently (I think Donnie's is currently in hearings over it?) and they were saying he's accused of fraud. Is it actually fraud? You got any heckin' SOURCES?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no that's probably the "we don't have a victim but he lied on paperwork to get a loan" case in new york
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pretty sure thats a different case, that's the NY trial that just started. The SCOTUS isn't involved in that, this is from the Biden Justice Dept trying to charge him with Jan 6th election interference shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is correct
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Oh, I thought it was the NY one. There are so many cases going right now, anyone able to remind me how Georgia is going, after the DA and her snookums got outed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!commenters this is a good summary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i dont remember signing up for this ping group
!slots399
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The other replies are r-slurred and wrong. This isn't the hooker case this is about the January 6th one. Specifically how far does presidential immunity go, which would also effect the Florida, Georgia, and New York cases as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but those are all boring
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context