Unable to load image

Donald Trump's alleged 'sexual proclivities' graphically detailed in new Epstein documents

https://old.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1durt3q/donald_trumps_alleged_sexual_proclivities/

wtf did nobody else post this????? don't make me get my news from Reddit :marseybeanangry:

Graphic details about Donald Trump's alleged "sexual proclivities" have emerged in the latest round of court documents containing details of late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein's associates.

The new documents contain "incendiary claims" about the former president, including accusations that he had sexual relations with "many girls", made by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Sarah Ransome.

Mr Trump's name has appeared a handful of times previously in the documents and, while not accusing him of wrongdoing, appears to illustrate the good relationship he had with the disgraced financier.

In the newly unsealed documents, Ms Ransome testified that her unnamed friend "was one of the many girls that had sexual relations with Donald Trump" – including at Epstein's New York townhouse.

"She confided in me about her casual 'friendship' with Donald. Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her 'pert nipples'," she testified.

She then described in graphic detail how Mr Trump allegedly caused pain to the victim's nipples – and claimed she saw the resulting injury firsthand.

"I also know she had sexual relations with Trump at Jeffery's NY mansion on regular occasions as I once met Jen for coffee, just before she was going to meet Trump and Epstein together at his mansion," she said.

Patriot cope (just starting):

Epstein docs going around today, please tell me this is not real

Apparently the left is reeeiiinnng about Trump in the recently-released Epstein docs. Anyone know anything about it?

Edit: Now I'm confused

This article is from January?? The demonrats are passing off old news as new revelations, using the recent unsealing to pretend this is new information??? No way

27
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So he pulled on some lady's nipples? That's the worst they could come up with?

I've done way worse and I didn't even have to go on a remote island.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've done way worse

Mmhmmm, please post your address so I can have the authorities come scoop you up

:#marseynotestalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The lady was 22 to be clear. If you haven't done worse than pulling on some 22yo woman's nipples I feel bad for you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hecko, criminal scum. Please do not resist and prepare your bussy

:#marseyceilingtalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I sure hope no one will pull my nipples :marseybiting:

https://media.giphy.com/media/13hIkIWmBwkoXm/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they aren't pierced, we cannot be homies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They aren't pierced on account of I'm not a manwhore.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good for you :marseythumbsup:. I just said the most neurodivergent :marseycrayoneater: thing that came to mind at the time :marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydance:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

22? woodchipper time :taysmart:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There :marseycheerup: are allegations from women :marseyuterus: who were underage :marseynominers: and his public comments about Epstein's preference for kids make it difficult to defend that he was at absolute minimum unaware of what was going :marseysal3: on. The Qanon :marseyqoomer: folks developed an elaborate lore to cope with this by claiming it was part of his plan to oust all of them in the Storm.

I really :marseythinkorino2: hate the state :marseycoonass: of American :marseyridin: politics. Is it that hard to have a consistent ethic regarding diddlers? :marseypuke:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

While I don't doubt drumpfler is a degen if they had any p-do material on him they'd probably would have released it by now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can only comment on what people quote in rdrama posts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:!contentiouscereal: Then why was he the only guy to talk to the feds about Epstein?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's even worse. This SICK FRICK is sexually attracted to young adult women! Throw the book at him and throw away the keys!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's kind of wholesome :marseywholesome: that Trump was like "I want the best s*x. I want the craziest s*x. I want you to match me up with the kind of girls you just can't get anywhere else." And Epstein intuitively understood that what Trump really wanted was a mildly enthusiastic 22 year old—probably blonde—with better than average nipples.

Like I know Epstein wasn't a great guy, but wow, good shout on that one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Doesn't matter. The guy is the Darth Vadar of media and politics. He seems to thrive off the darkness and negative press.

:#soysnoo: :#soysnoo3: :#soyjakfront: :#bigsmilesoyjak: :#soyjak: :#soyjakhipster: :#soyjakfat: :#soyjakyell: :#soybert:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This article is from January?? The demonrats are passing off old news as new revelations, using the recent unsealing to pretend this is new information??? No way

Literally the same exact thing that was happening with Justice Thomas like 2 weeks ago. They jumped back into his (allowable) gifts like it was a new bomb shell report, despite the fact it already fell on its face the first time the "story" broke. They're down to recycling the same news to drive internet engagement.

Part of me thinks that this rehashing habit they have is due to whatever publicity firm they've hired trying to keep engagement numbers high during the election cycle in order to continue billing the DNC/PACs. So long as you keep churning views, you still get to say you met the engagement numbers required as the consulting firm.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So long as you keep churning views, you still get to say you met the engagement numbers required as the consulting firm.

Bingo, also because the dems have a perpetual turnout issue. Younger voters on avg dgaf about turning up at the voting booth, so they gotta outrage us in order to try to get them there

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ransome said that "she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein's behavior, and to make him believe that she had 'evidence that would come out if he harmed me'"

:#marseynothingburger:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

alleged

:#marseynothingburger:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

less than that, it's third-party hearsay allegations. my friend said someone did something :marseyattentionseeker:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's it? He's mote vanilla than myself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>This article is from January?? The demonrats are passing off old news as new revelations, using the recent unsealing to pretend this is new information??? No way

The "D" in Democrate stands for "Doesn't ever bamboozle".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17200694777641761.webp

Jinxthinkers knew this already


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Democrats are pulling out old debunked shit because they desperately need Trump to say something or do something, which he hasn't done since the debate. They need the news to take the spotlight off Biden for the moment. But this new - and shockingly disciplined - Trump isn't taking the bait.

"COME ON, DO A THING TRUMP, ANNOUNCE YOUR VP PICK OR SOMETHING!!!"

"No."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1durt3q/donald_trumps_alleged_sexual_proclivities/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.