On one hand, I get the desire to have highlights - watching a 25-minute segment about the interview is long enough, having to watch the whole 1-2 hour thing would be much longer.
But they should still release the full thing. Put a link to the highlights if you want, but let people watch it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So the people saying it was edited to make her look less incoherent and flailing were completely right
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not deceitful if you're fooling viewers in good faith.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Really releasing the unedited footage would be deceitful because it would be trying to convince people that she's not competent, which we know she is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
On one hand, I get the desire to have highlights - watching a 25-minute segment about the interview is long enough, having to watch the whole 1-2 hour thing would be much longer.
But they should still release the full thing. Put a link to the highlights if you want, but let people watch it.
Ah heck we all know why they won't lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
When we do deceitful editing, it's in good faith and wholesome. When Project Veritas does it, it's in bad faith and they are stinky heads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context