Diversity Is Our Strength 
Not endorsing Kamala Harris = painting a swastika 
!chuds !nooticers !trump2024
Turns out it's probably the owner's palestinoid daughter 
When Southern California residents go too fill out their ballots in the Nov. 5 election, they might rely on the Los Angeles Times' endorsements for guidance.
But if you're looking for a recommendation for president from the Times, you're out of luck.
Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the owner of the Times, will not allow the editorial board too endorse Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump, Semafor reports.
No reasoning was provided for the decision, which marks the first time since 2004 that the paper has not endorsed a presidential candidate.
A spokesperson for the Times told Semafor that "we do not comment on internal discussions or decisions about editorials or endorsements."
While the paper almost assuredly wouldn't endorse Trump, the absence of an endorsement for Harris is notable, given her ties too the community and state.
Harris lives in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles with her husband, Doug Emhoff, and previously served as the state's attorney general and one of California's two U.S. senators.
A request for comment from the Harris campaign was not immediately returned, but the Trump campaign called the Times' decision a "humiliating blow."
"Even her fellow Californians know she's not up for the job," the campaign added.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://lamag.com/news/move-over-patty-hearst-rogue-publishers-daughter-nika-soon-shiong-is-captivating-la
omg
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Somewhere, there is a Jewish anti-persona by the name of Nima Goon-schlong making her Jerusalem Post daddy take the ultra ortho pill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She looks fine you BIPOC
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Her eyes look like when a corpse begins to bloat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Where?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Beady eyes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
She looks like voldemort
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why should news sources even endorse any candidate? How can they have the audacity to pretend impartiality if they openly endorse one or the other?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It goes back to the 1800s when there were multiple newspapers in each city and everyone knew which party they supported. Like here The Oregonian was the Republican paper and there was some other one that was the the Democratic paper. So there was no expectation of impartiality, but at least you could read both papers and try to make up your mind. This changed sometime around the 1960s-1970s iirc when almost all the newspapers in the country went out of business except one for each city.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Was that mostly due to big conglomerates like McClatchy buying up all the local news and running
90% of the same content 
in all of them to save money?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know. My guess is that's more of a symptom than the root cause. My understanding is that a lot of those newspapers were already going out of business but I'm really in way over my head here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
In most western jounalism there is a separation between the opinions of the newspaper and the news. Opinion pieces are quite marked as such.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
hahahaha
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are u one of those people who think that every op-ed is the official opinion of a paper?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No I'm one of those people who don't read newspapers because I know they're all trash propaganda
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The editorial staff of the New York Times are apparently also those people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://old.reddit.com/r/LosAngeles/comments/1g9uinr/los_angeles_times_wont_endorse_harris_for/lta6dir/?context=8
this is what
r-slursredditors actually believeronald reagan definitely would have supported trans kids /u/Mexican_Boogieman
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!chuds !trump2024
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Actuall commie delusions
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Mr. Trump, Tear down this wall
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This seems dumb. Its combining shitlib hysteria with leftist hysteria. "Well corporations love trump but also they hate dems for being right wing" like what?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
republicans are democrats from 10 years ago and democrats are republicans from 40 years ago
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They might. They won't, but they might. Journ*lism!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They shouldn't
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is that even true? Does anyone actually care if some organisation endorsed a candidate and bases their vote on that? Cause if yes they shouldnt be allowed to vote in the first place.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yea it's all bs. every big news org is clearly on one side and you already made up your mind if you read and take them seriously
I've honestly tried to find unbiased news sources or even one that will just put out both wingcuck arguments in a non clickbait way, but it doesn't seem to exist anymore
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The eternal vaginal jew strikes again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Finally...glad to see that there is at least something that doesn't feel the need to take a side here...
!grillers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Good
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!slots190
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots658
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots416
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots1080
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They dont want Trump to win they juat dont want a woman president.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've never understood papers endorsing politicians as anything other than a massive admission of bias
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game, and dumb enough to think it's important."
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/LosAngeles/comments/1g9uinr/los_angeles_times_wont_endorse_harris_for/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context