Electors are calculated based on each individual state -- one for each Senator (two) plus an amount scaled for the amount of Representatives.
You don't just "add more electors" because that's not how they are summed.
The Constitution has a function built in in the event of a tie in the 12th Amendment:
The House of Representatives chooses the next President. However each separate state casts a single vote, regardless of population, meaning that California and Kansas are considered equal in this scenario, just like how British parliamentary bullshit goes.
The Senate chooses the next Vice President.
inb4 "that's r-slurred"
There is absolutely no written law or mandate in the UK that there has to be a Prime Minister, and there is absolutely no governing procedure to determine how he is chosen. The King just randomly points at someone and says "you." Parliament does a vote and makes a suggestion and quite often it is who the King wants for the job that doesn't exist. !burgers they actually do this in England:
The office of prime minister is not established by any statute or constitutional document, but exists only by long-established convention, whereby the monarch appoints as prime minister the person most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.
Yep. Each state casts a single vote (through Representatives). This is hilarious because Democrats hold a national popular majority, but Republicans control the majority of states because they are borderline unpopulated.
In the tie-breaker scenario, California, New York, Virginia, and Washington each matter as much as North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, and Wyoming.
misterwiggerwig/gity
My father made wigs. His father made wigs. And his father... made... wigs!!!
CharlesSneedbergTheThird 1mo ago#7248981
Edited 1mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
I'm pretty sure this is Nate Silver's fault somehow.
The electors are apportioned according to the number of each state's Senators and Representatives, to mimic the compromise established for the legislative branch. So far, so good.
When the size of the House of Representatives was fixed at 435 instead of increasing with population, there were 48 states with 96 Senators (two per state), making for 531 electors. Adding Hawaii and Alaska to the union added 4 Senators so made 535 electors. But then they messed it up by giving 3 electors to the District of Columbia because they whined about not getting to vote for President since it is not a state, which makes 538.
Snogfathersookies/milk
Have a Very 1995 Marcia Brady Fistmas
JimieWhales 1mo ago#7249401Found 35 Coins!
spent 0 currency on pings
They can make the lives of any politicians who live there more uncomfortable or luxurious.
"No electors? Low flow potty environmental law enacted, and building inspectors are raiding every politician's residence and whore apartment. For 3-6 months of the year, your potty is clogging at every other flush."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The number of electors is even? Who designed this shite? !burgers explain yourselves
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Electors are calculated based on each individual state -- one for each Senator (two) plus an amount scaled for the amount of Representatives.
You don't just "add more electors" because that's not how they are summed.
The Constitution has a function built in in the event of a tie in the 12th Amendment:
The House of Representatives chooses the next President. However each separate state casts a single vote, regardless of population, meaning that California and Kansas are considered equal in this scenario, just like how British parliamentary bullshit goes.
The Senate chooses the next Vice President.
inb4 "that's r-slurred"
There is absolutely no written law or mandate in the UK that there has to be a Prime Minister, and there is absolutely no governing procedure to determine how he is chosen. The King just randomly points at someone and says "you." Parliament does a vote and makes a suggestion and quite often it is who the King wants for the job that doesn't exist. !burgers they actually do this in England:
!historychads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Founding fathers thought it would be really, really funny if there was a tie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally unironically, people of the past loved immaculate irony
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the corrupt bargain was hilarious tbf
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Factcheck: WARNING! THIS CLAIM HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS DANGEROUS. PLEASE REMAIN STILL, AN AGENT WILL COME TO MEET YOU SHORTLY.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's so !grillers get represented, genius
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The tie break can also tie btw
But I think it's unlikely this time around
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yep. Each state casts a single vote (through Representatives). This is hilarious because Democrats hold a national popular majority, but Republicans control the majority of states because they are borderline unpopulated.
In the tie-breaker scenario, California, New York, Virginia, and Washington each matter as much as North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, and Wyoming.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm pretty sure this is Nate Silver's fault somehow.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
more like Nate BRONZE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If we get a tie, he deserves a Nate Gold
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The electors are apportioned according to the number of each state's Senators and Representatives, to mimic the compromise established for the legislative branch. So far, so good.
When the size of the House of Representatives was fixed at 435 instead of increasing with population, there were 48 states with 96 Senators (two per state), making for 531 electors. Adding Hawaii and Alaska to the union added 4 Senators so made 535 electors. But then they messed it up by giving 3 electors to the District of Columbia because they whined about not getting to vote for President since it is not a state, which makes 538.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why not take away one of DC's electors? It's not like they can vote against it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They can make the lives of any politicians who live there more uncomfortable or luxurious.
"No electors? Low flow potty environmental law enacted, and building inspectors are raiding every politician's residence and whore apartment. For 3-6 months of the year, your potty is clogging at every other flush."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok but they should do that already without the elector shenanigans though...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah the House is supposed to have like 1,300 representatives in it by now going by the original rules
We should go back to that; I think it would be fun and dramatic to 4x the size of congress
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like those things the chinks do lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
We already have some really stupid reps lol.
Imagine what happens when we have a dude who can't read representing the ghettos of St. Louis
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They aren't evenly split among states....
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why not make it 541 so it's prime? Guess wasn't very good at math
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Terrible marsey. Who made that? Only is worse.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Keep yourself safe btw !followers !downmarseyrs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context