Snopes chuds out too

That was such an r-slured cope it was unbelievable. No surprise there was a popular thread on /r/teachers that parroted it

That said, because the executive order did not explain what was meant by "belonging" to a s*x, it's possible to interpret its definitions of male and female as either excluding all humans from both sexes or, alternatively, including all humans in both sexes.

Lol, Snopes still tried to find a hoop to jump through to appease leftoids.

The disinformation:

The Snopes debunking from muh beloved fact checkers:

This is like seeing an ancient citadel being captured by barbarians

It's a shame while redditors were jerking themselves off celebrating this fake news noone thought to ask them

>but are you in favor of this, and if not, why not?

TLDR the Snopes article says

>the definition is bad because it didn't just use chromosomes

One possible definition would be a genetic one, with all humans possessing XX chromosomes defined as belonging to the female s*x and all humans possessing XY chromosomes defined as belonging to the male s*x.

That approach would have had its own issues. There are genetic conditions, albeit rare ones, that can result in a person having an XX chromosome but male sexual characteristics or vice versa. There are also conditions that can result in nonstandard sexual genotypes, such as XXY. That said, because the vast majority of zygotes have from conception either XX or XY chromosomes corresponding to the types of genitalia they'll eventually develop, using genetics as the foundation for the executive order's definition of belonging to a s*x would have some grounding in science.

I dunno why people like to deboonk things using a site run by some guy and his estranged wife, but I guess a broken clock is right twice a day !transphobes

whole thing's secular propaganda

everyone knows women grow from mens' ribs

R-slurs here were parroting this bullshit too

"Your s*x is determined by your genitals" is a weird basis for those people to use for their argument.

Do they have one about the elon "nazi salute" thing?

Seems like that might be a good use of their time. Suspiciously absent tho.

Yeah open the schools. You have bipotential sexual features. The second your sperm and egg mix you're that s*x forever. The word gonad is the psudo form of testies and ovaries. I'll just post some answer from chatgpt:

In the womb, the structures that develop into male or female genitals are initially referred to as indifferent genitalia or bipotential genitalia. This is because they are undifferentiated and have the potential to develop into either male or female genitalia depending on genetic and hormonal influences.

Key components include:

Genital tubercle: Develops into the clitoris in females or the peepee in males.

Urogenital folds: Form the labia minora in females or fuse to form the penile shaft in males.

Labioscrotal swellings: Develop into the labia majora in females or the scrotum in males.

The differentiation process is influenced by the presence or absence of androgens, primarily driven by the fetus's chromosomes (XX or XY).

SUCK THE GIRL PEE PEE

"A liberal is a conservative who has been arrested."

Snapshots:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-executive-order-all-humans-female/:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)

Has snopes done an article on Elon's Nazi salute yet??