Reported by:
  • pH : this but with no irony

Pro eugenics perfect argument

Prove it wrong challenge: impossible.

72
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I suppose chuds would say we always had tards and uglies in our society, while the increasing immigration is a relatively new phenomenon and is accelerating every decade.

Levels of trust are probably higher on average with the former too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Intelligent people are more trusting by nature. Combine that with lack of violent crime, I think high IQ society would beat any ethnostate easily

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong.

Intelligent people are more trusting by nature.

Deceitful third worlders trick you into getting poorer while they steal anything and everything that is not rooted to the floor.

Trusting people get pulled into dark alleys easier.

High IQ societies collapse under their own weight.

The tragedy of hyperintelligence is individually already known to be a curse

The same applies to societies and species and ethnicities that are ahead of their time.

They win in their time and stop playing, but the truth is there is no real win button.

Neanderthals went extinct like this.

Mayos will too go extinct like this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

High trust societies are 100 times more succesful than low trust societies even with all the negatives you listed. The fun part is the society will be so great that nobody will be pulled into any dark alleys. Everybody is so rich that crime makes no sense. And the gains from cooperating become so high that defecting quickly becomes unprofitable after a few iterations. And if the society embraced eugenics, they'll be redpilled on the realities of the world and won't suffocate by importing too many low IQ third worlders.

>The tragedy of hyperintelligence is individually already known to be a curse

Only because you can't relate the to midwits. But in a society where everybody is a smart, you don't have this problem anymore.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, there's a sweet spot of societal cohesiveness called "trust but verify." Once you go beyond that point into "listen and believe" you have basically hit Intelligence 18 Wisdom 3 territory.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My relatively high-trust society works despite nothing getting verified. There are tons of opportunities to do crime and enrich myself, but me and my community chose not to do that. My convenience store allows me to enter with a bag and a mask, there is no security, yet it is economical.

At most you need to do random sample verifications (at a rate much lower than game theory would predict for rational actors) to keep people from commiting crimes that are easy to rationalize.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Don't trust anybody"

Intelligence 3 Wisdom 18

:#marseykente:

"Trust but verify"

Intelligence 18 Wisdom 18

:#marseygigachad:

"Listen and believe"

Intelligence 18 Wisdom 3

:#marseyshitforbrains:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

High trust societies are 100 times more succesful than low trust societies even with all the negatives you listed.

yes but its a twice as bright half as long scenario

Everybody is so rich that crime makes no sense.

By 1940's standards of rich multiple developed countries have already reached that point.

And the gains from cooperating become so high that defecting quickly becomes unprofitable after a few iterations.

game theory, high int. deceit also becomes more profitable than ever before.

And if the society embraced eugenics, they'll be redpilled on the realities of the world and won't suffocate by importing too many low IQ third worlders.

if

But in a society where everybody is a smart, you don't have this problem anymore.

societies dont exist in a vacuum. Competition and threats arise from externalities instead of internalities.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Subscribed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.