Free SPAL chud rant: bioleninism
i had this inchoate idea before reading it, and i don't agree with him exactly - but one thing is true,
the ugly, low status moid is a danger to civilization.
ugly moids' sexual frustration sublimates into wingCUCKery, this is now the term's canon origin.
there is a reason why chud and lanklet commie phenotypes exist, the ugly man's inferiority precedes his way of being. genetic capital flows upwards, the upper class inherit beauty and intelligence by the nature of sexual selection. this is an eternal restriction to class mobility. Fussell talks about this.
in their fundamental debasement, the incel, DEIst, and commie are the same; redistributionists, social failures, dysgenic men collectivizing against the naturally superior via a language of half-true persecution.
We don't want women to frick better men, we don't want you to spend money as you wish, they are EVIL for not picking us
to do this, they explain away the individual's superiority by a collective will theory (Death of the Author, historicism, trends and forces, labor theory of value) and say the social order is arbitrary (moral relativism, systemic oppression, deconstruction)
here is such an example: deconstructing 'ugliness'
Indeed, to be labeled "ugly‟ is a source of pain and discomfort. In this essay I argue that ugliness is a political category informed by inequalities and hierarchical binaries and that ugliness can be deconstructed and deployed strategically by way of Judith Butler‟s notion of performativity
(2) ugliness is necessarily contingent and relational, it is never an individual concern but rather exists because bodies are compared to one another, and because they are evaluated in accordance to the "norm‟
Author: 
Rating: 5
Nietzsche said it earlier (1889)
Christian and anarchist.—When the anarchist, as the mouthpiece of the declining levels of society, insists on “right,” “justice,” “equal rights” with such beautiful indignation, he is just acting under the pressure of his lack of culture, which cannot grasp why he really suffers, what he is poor in— in life. . .
A drive to find causes is powerful in him: it must be somebody's fault that he's feeling bad . . . Even his “beautiful indignation” does him good; all poor devils like to whine—it gives them a little thrill of power
The objects of this need for revenge as a need for pleasure are just the incidental causes: the sufferer finds causes everywhere for venting his petty vengefulness
modern Nazis are dysgenic because it is now an extremist ideology
surprisingly I could find NO STUDY for this question of essential importance.
measure for political extremism
ask about their s*x life
have group rate their attractiveness
adjust for demographics
truth is out there
one solution is to subsidize ugly people, a tax the beautiful would feel proud to pay. alternatively, give the ugly subsidies for sterilization - I predict this will save us from a revolution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm happy for you, or I'm sorry that happened
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the destruction of civilization is a necessary process of civilization. losers and their frustrations are a mechanism of the whole rather than an aberration
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm worried technology will change some fundamental assumption human civilization as a whole (not just as we understand our particular civilization) is built on and create an unrecoverable disaster.
That doesn't mean I think the solution is to give up tech and join the Amish, but the necessary development for our competitive survival might also destroy us.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're right, chemicals and nuclear materials that don't exist nature need constant upkeep and storage. Remove civilization, remove the caretakers of industry, guess what happens, the entire planet made toxic and radioactive. The end of this civilization is the end of Homo sapiens.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Correct, which is why slowing down is not a viable option. We can choose how we embrace new technology, though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Great post, I always avoided trying to look into bioleninism when reading nrx theory because, like "cultural marxism", the name sounds laughably r-slurred, but now I realize that even if the name is bad, the concept needs a way to easily refer to it due to it's significant and intentionally understated role in the processes which led to the world we see today.
On page 29, the "Coalition of the fringes" is brought up, I'd say that modern chuds/contrarians (including "independents" like libertarians and contrarian lefties) could be considered a sort of coalition of fringes united in opposition to the previous coalition of fringes which is now in power, a phenomenon very different from the past practice of coalitions with an agreed-upon platform. This may be due to much of modern politics being metapolitical, about what ideas are within the Overton Window rather than what ideas are directly put into policy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Surely the man who coined "wingcuck" was not aware of this interpretation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes, he isn't
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Using the heritability of IQ and the fact that higher IQ on average leads to higher income, it should be possible to calculate the "correct" amount of social mobility. I.e., the amount you'd get if everyone has all the opportunity they can handle and nobody has their thumb on the scale to favor certain groups.
It'd probably be harder to calculate what the mobility spike would look like as a misalignment gets corrected, like say hereditary serf / noble distinctions losing effect in Jolly Old England or Jim Crow getting its nads kicked in over here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It'd be pretty simple it's literally just a PDE. You need to make some assumption about how men and women pair off and how IQ translates to status and you're done. You don't even need to work out the whole PDE if all you care about is the absorbing state. Set all the time derivatives to zero.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i am not an iq gnostic
smart uglies lead the stupid uglies to revolt against the beautiful
it just happens that beautiful people are often more intelligent than ugly ones, by the nature of sexual selection
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Historically, who do you think was the fodder for pretty much every war ever? You think some twenty-five year old Sergeant in Napoleon's army wouldn't be considered an absolute fricking goblin by anybody's standards? Don't subsidize uggos. Draft them.
In the words of Gore Vidal's dumb b-word daughter in 1876, "there are too many of these men. You need another war."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Grillpillers STAY winning
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
bioleninism:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Fussell talks about this:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
deconstructing:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
subsidize:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context