Free SPAL chud rant: bioleninism
i had this inchoate idea before reading it, and i don't agree with him exactly - but one thing is true,
the ugly, low status moid is a danger to civilization.
ugly moids' sexual frustration sublimates into wingCUCKery, this is now the term's canon origin.
there is a reason why chud and lanklet commie phenotypes exist, the ugly man's inferiority precedes his way of being. genetic capital flows upwards, the upper class inherit beauty and intelligence by the nature of sexual selection. this is an eternal restriction to class mobility. Fussell talks about this.
in their fundamental debasement, the incel, DEIst, and commie are the same; redistributionists, social failures, dysgenic men collectivizing against the naturally superior via a language of half-true persecution.
We don't want women to frick better men, we don't want you to spend money as you wish, they are EVIL for not picking us
to do this, they explain away the individual's superiority by a collective will theory (Death of the Author, historicism, trends and forces, labor theory of value) and say the social order is arbitrary (moral relativism, systemic oppression, deconstruction)
here is such an example: deconstructing 'ugliness'
Indeed, to be labeled "ugly‟ is a source of pain and discomfort. In this essay I argue that ugliness is a political category informed by inequalities and hierarchical binaries and that ugliness can be deconstructed and deployed strategically by way of Judith Butler‟s notion of performativity
(2) ugliness is necessarily contingent and relational, it is never an individual concern but rather exists because bodies are compared to one another, and because they are evaluated in accordance to the "norm‟
Author: 
Rating: 5
Nietzsche said it earlier (1889)
Christian and anarchist.—When the anarchist, as the mouthpiece of the declining levels of society, insists on “right,” “justice,” “equal rights” with such beautiful indignation, he is just acting under the pressure of his lack of culture, which cannot grasp why he really suffers, what he is poor in— in life. . .
A drive to find causes is powerful in him: it must be somebody's fault that he's feeling bad . . . Even his “beautiful indignation” does him good; all poor devils like to whine—it gives them a little thrill of power
The objects of this need for revenge as a need for pleasure are just the incidental causes: the sufferer finds causes everywhere for venting his petty vengefulness
modern Nazis are dysgenic because it is now an extremist ideology
surprisingly I could find NO STUDY for this question of essential importance.
measure for political extremism
ask about their s*x life
have group rate their attractiveness
adjust for demographics
truth is out there
one solution is to subsidize ugly people, a tax the beautiful would feel proud to pay. alternatively, give the ugly subsidies for sterilization - I predict this will save us from a revolution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Historically, who do you think was the fodder for pretty much every war ever? You think some twenty-five year old Sergeant in Napoleon's army wouldn't be considered an absolute fricking goblin by anybody's standards? Don't subsidize uggos. Draft them.
In the words of Gore Vidal's dumb b-word daughter in 1876, "there are too many of these men. You need another war."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context