You may be wondering right now, why can't Palestinians support a group that's, you know, nice? Why do so many support Hamas?
To answer that, I have to tell you some of the history of Fatah, the Palestinian revolutionaries from my boomer generation and how they failed.
PFLP, DFLP, PFLP-GC, PFLP-LMAO, etc.
Leila Khaled, airplane hikacker for the PFLP.
Besides Fatah there were countless Palestinian groups formed by refugees by the 1960s. While they ostensibly were radical Marxists out to destroy Israel, in practice they ended up as mercenaries working for one or more other Arab countries or the KGB. Much of their time was spent fighting each other on behalf of their foreign masters. Their fighters were largely drawn from the desperate poor of the refugee camps who simply signed on so their families wouldn't starve.
Bourj el-Barajneh refugee camp, Beirut.
These groups carried out most of the spectacular international terrorist operations that the Palestinians became known for like airplane hijackings. These attacks did little to further the Palestinian cause but alienated the world. Some were clearly designed to offend, like pushing an elderly Jewish man in a wheelchair off the side of a cruise ship. (This is not to say Fatah didn't do some really sadistic terror attacks too.)
Rome Airport after the massacre by Abu Nidal's gang, 1985.
These radical groups quickly withered away to irrelevance when the Soviet Union collapsed and the whole ecosystem of state sponsored terrorism with it. But they left a legacy for Fatah. These were the guys they didn't want to be like: corrupt, out of touch with the people, and beholden to foreign governments.
Fatah's Rise & Fall
Fatah's origin is similar to these other groups except that after the 1967 war they broke away Egyptian control. While they still relied on foreign funding they found several sponsors so they could maintain their independence.
Abu Ammar AKA Yasser Arafat with Nasser and King Hussein.
They built up their forces among the refugees in Jordan and began raiding into Israel, quickly rising to prominence on exaggerated tales of their successes. But as charismatic as Yasser Arafat was, he had difficulty controlling his own party, let alone the radical factions. By 1970 the King of Jordan had enough and drove them out in a short but bloody struggle.
King Hussein inspecting captured Israeli equipment after the Battle of Karameh, 1968. Jordanian troops were mostly responsible for the victory but Fatah got the credit.
Next the Palestinians moved into Lebanon and started raiding again. Their arrival tipped the fragile balance of power there and civil war broke out, with Fatah as one of the most powerful factions. When they seemed about to win, the Lebanese Christians invited Syria in to stop them. Eventually a stalemate held with the Palestinians mostly restricted to a zone along the Israeli border.
Fatah members in Beirut, 1979.
By now Fatah had alienated Jordan, Syria, and most of Lebanon. The next shoe to drop was Egypt, which made a separate peace with Israel and became a pariah across the Arab world. Israel would never again have to worry about a conventional attack, so their army was freed up to invade Lebanon in 1982. Fatah's pitiful military forces were crushed and the survivors agreed to leave for exile in Tunisia, the closest Arab country willing to take them in.
Israeli troops drive toward the strategically vital Beaufort Castle, 1982.
The years that followed were bleak. With no way to attack Israel, the party lost a lot of its relevance. It could do little to protect the refugee camps, which suffered terribly at the hands of the Israelis and then even worse from the Syrians. Many of the best leaders were assassinated or defected. Several increasingly pitiful attempts were made to return to Lebanon and carve out a new enclave there. Finally Arafat made an incredibly stupid blunder, siding with Saddam Hussein against the US-led coalition in Desert Storm, which outraged the Saudis and most of the world. Meanwhile the US and regional powers gave Syria the green light to crush any opposition in Lebanon, ending any hope of Fatah returning.
Note that by now Fatah has been betrayed by or betrayed every nearby Arab country except Iraq.
Intifada
In the late 1980s-early 1990s, the nadir of Fatah, an unexpected event turned the situation upside down. Remember Palestine, the country that all of this was supposed to be about? Fatah and the radical Marxists had fantasized that the refugees would build up an army and invade Israel from the outside. This was clearly delusional now as they had proven to be at best a speed bump in a full-scale war.
But now those forgotten Palestinians remaining in the occupied West Bank and Gaza rose up in the Intifada, a fiery but mostly peaceful campaign to oppose the occupation. They managed to accomplish more in a few years than Fatah ever had with all its terrorism and bloodshed.
The first Intifada.
Israel finally agreed to peace negotiations and Arafat returned to Palestine to lead it. But too much damage had already been done. Fatah was as corrupt and out of touch with the population as the rival groups it had supplanted. It got few concessions of any consequence from the Israelis. As the peace process dragged on it gradually dependent on the USA and even Israel for financial, military, and intelligence support. By the mid 2000s it had lost most of its popular support and credibility as an independent voice for the nation.
An older and less impressive Arafat with Bill Clinton and Ehud Barak, 2000.
An alternative to Fatah began to emerge during the intifada. Hamas was newer and hipper, employing the Islamist ideology that was popular with the younger generation. But more importantly, it hadn't proven itself to be a failure the way Fatah had. It didn't carry the baggage of decades of broken promises and compromises with the enemy
Most Palestinians were in such a desperate situation that in the 2006 election they preferred the wild psychos of Hamas. At least they were fighting against the Israelis, not asking them for help fighting their political opponents at home. Fatah took its loss in the election about as well as Trump did and fighting broke out. They held onto power in the West Bank but Hamas took Gaza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You really elided over the Oslo Accords.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah I was trying to stay focused because I knew it was already too many . Also that period is really complicated. Also I don't know it very well because I haven't read as much and I was too young to really understand while it was happening.
Basically the point that matters about it here is that Fatah came into the peace process already in a weak state where they couldn't get Israel to deliver much. And in the process they made compromises that left them more and more under Israel and America's influence. (Of course it's more complicated, like the second intifada, but I kinda tried to squeeze the whole 1993-2006 period into a few sentences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notice the sharp dip to almost nothing in 1993. With the end of the Cold War the old-school terrorist groups didn't have Soviet-aligned countries for bases. The jihadis came in the '90s to replace them.
Also your graph is r-slurred. It's probably counting acts of terrorism inside a country in recent times but not in boomer times. I guarantee you there was way more going on in places like Vietnam. And there were terrorist attacks in Europe on a daily basis pre-1992.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Probably just accounts for extreme increase in countries like Afg/Pak plus some outliers like the Colombian guys, our worst period of terrorism was the 90s-00s too. There's
7k casualties,4k incidents even in 1990 which is >10 per day, not exactly minute. I wouldn't be surprised if Pakis alone account for ~20-30% of that, 90s was when they really came into their own as terror sponsors.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doesn't Bharat still have problems with Maoist terrorists in the central countryside along with Sikhs wanting TOTAL SIKHISM VICTORY?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maoists still exist but are weakest they have ever been and Khalistanis don't at all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think he might tbe talking about the Palestine related ones but
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That and far left terrorist groups in Europe and the Middle East. Like the Red Army Faction, Red Brigades, etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Those are mosque sponsored terror attacks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In the '90s there's a big shift from terrorists getting paid by nation states to handing around the collection plate for individual donors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The power of crowdfunding inshallah
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah but that happens in irrelevant shitholes now for the most part, whereas in 1970s Europe a bomb was going off essentially every day and tons of important people were getting assassinated Lebanon style
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Palestinians are the LeBron James of terrorism
Kind of have to feel bad for Palis that they were sent into exile, forced into shitty camps where they can never assimilate into Arab countries to not lose their claim to Palestine, then be forced into mercenary work killing other Palis and Arabs on the distant promise that they'll fight to liberate their homeland. Imagine being told your going to liberate Palestine then being told to play gangland in your refugee camp. Then they blow up an air plane or shoot up a synagogue and you feel less bad for them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I read this whole thing, great writing
I like how you italicized the image descriptions
I also spent half an hour reading this whole wiki on the cruise ship hijack. Completely wild. Regan had F14s intercept a civilian airliner and the NAVY SEAL dude violated Italian airspace twice lmao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achille_Lauro_hijacking
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For once SOMEBODY ACTUALLY APPRECIATES THE WORK I DO AROUND HERE!!!
I think the response to the Achilles Lauro hijacking was very similar Carter's response to the Iranian hostage crisis. It's an impossible situation where the terrorists held all the cards and the president got frustrated.
This stuff must seem simple to zoomers but you have to remember the big thing everyone was always thinking about was the Soviets invading western Europe. Italy was important because it had lots of airbases with nice thicc runways.
Also I do not get why Egypt supported these people. Egypt had renounced the Palestinian cause and was a pariah among Arabs. Best guess is much of the population was really pissed about Mubarak betraying the Palestinians so this was an attempt to claim he was on their side about murdering random Jews at least.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context