Unable to load image

Brand new $600 Intel CPU can't beat $450 AMD CPU released half a year ago, neither can brand new $700 AMD processor

It's close to the end of the year, you know what that means! More expensive shit that holds little to no tangible benefit compared to the expensive shit that came out last year!!! The current focus is on CPUs and boy oh boy this is one of the product launches ever.

To start off with, AMD's new zen 4 processors operate at 95°c regardless of how beefy your cooling solution is. This is by design, apparently.

AMD went on to say that 95C is not running hot, rather Zen 4 will intentionally go to this temperature as much as possible under load because the power management system knows that this is the ideal way to squeeze the most performance out of the chip without damaging it.

Good stuff.

Additionally, the big expensive ryzen 9 7950x only barely outpaces the significantly older ryzen 7 5800x3D which is really really funny.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841355054303732.webp

Intel has also recently decided to make it known that they exist too, announcing their new line of "raptor lake" processors. The graphs speak for themselves.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841355064111187.webp

In the midst all of this, many are still waiting for somebody to announce a product that isn't completely pointless.

78
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Spotted the 10 fps lowest graphic settings enjoyer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I got like 40fps most of the time

which is fine because when I was a kid I used to play tf2 at 12fps 640x480 on the family laptop and still had fun.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>40 fps

:holdupjak:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can't tell if you're a zoomer who's been spoiled by the modern age or a boomer who somehow got more picky about his video games as a grown man

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Once you do 120fps at 4k there isn't really any going back.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I never went there because I spend r-slurred amounts of money on vintage hardware and electronics equipment instead

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like what?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A variety of Japanese DOS computers and peripherals, signal generators and oscilloscopes, a few big fpga dev boards. It's a disease once you get started.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like vintage electronic music gear.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Heck yeah, I made a post of the sort of working apple ][ I think I made worse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Poorcel cope.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or I just enjoy high fps, which is the thesis of pc gaming in the first place.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>in the first place

Yeah if you ignore about a decade of strategy games, simulations, dumbed down arcade ports, and point and clicks skipping straight to doom I guess

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seethe console peasant.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No I actually like those types of pc games :marseyrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But they're boring

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>g*mer

>man

:#marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ive got a ryzen 7 and i play dos games

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Exactly This plus my first online games were all minimum 240 ping to US west servers from Australia because we are bums and never had servers for anything

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

when I was a kid I used to play tf2

:marseyzoomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't look up how old that game is now. Or how old teenagers playing it at launch would be.

I mean uh, that game bussin frfr no 🧢

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.