](/images/16648141766588044.webp)
Following the open-source release of Stable Diffusion, photos of violently beaten Asian women generated by Stable Diffusion were posted in online chat rooms. Reports also indicate that several 4chan threads have been dedicated to Stable Diffusion-generated pornography, some of which portray real people. In a message posted to users of the Stable Diffusion Groomercord, Stability AI Founder and CEO Emad Mostaque said to Stable Diffusion users, “If you want to make NSFW [Not Suitable for Work] or offensive things make it on your own GPUs when the model is released.” Mr. Mostaque then went on to tell users which GPUs were compatible with its model for the sake of using it to generate illicit content , content Mr. Mostaque knew or should have known would likely include illegal content.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Country is on fire and congress wants to focus on this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
CRISPR's dual-use already has defense analysts pooping bricks about boutique DIY pathogens. It's getting cheaper and you don't need a PhD to use it.
But of course that's bioweaponry, not AOC futanari femdom snuff porn.
!sd AOC futanari femdom snuff porn
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!sd AOC futanari femdom snuff porn
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
pls respond
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's off unfortunately.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
🚫
🚫
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Done king
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
thanks chief, I'm gonna go put a gun in my mouth
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
look at how long it took them to do a one month long gas price pause or whatever it was, then look at how quickly they drafted up new
bills for comparison
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Just piss on it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Libertarians are definitely a concern. Dual-use is also a legit argument, like how Saddam Hussein was using PS2 chips in guidance systems for SCUDs, which is why Apple includes wording about not using their product for nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Man this cracks me up. Imagine reading terms of service and you come by "You are forbidden from using this product for terroristic or otherwise harmful purposes", like a terrorist would care.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are certain federal "personal reliability program" forms that ask you if you have ever planned, or are currently planning to overthrow the United Statesnor commit acts of terror.
Like some r-slur is going to turn in a piece of paper with "yes" scribbled out and then writes in "no" below it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Law is so r-slurred sometimes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Makes me wonder if they do that to have the additional "falsification of a federal document" on the list of charges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That is exactly why they do that. It also allows them to fire you expeditiously even with union agreements and similar.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
bingo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Has any Chad ever said yes?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i guarantee people say yes to this periodically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
idk probably gets you a free swatting, and I heard you can turn those into a free $100k pretty easily
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Those sections on the SF86 are actually used pretty regularly. Former terrorists can still get security clearances as long as they disclose they're former status and stuff. It comes up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd doubt a former terrorist gets adjudicated for SI-TK
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IDK, I've seen a former terrorist get a generic Secret
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When I was applying for a visa waiver to enter the US one of the questions was if I was or had ever been involved in terrorist activity. Was almost tempted to put in yes, just for the laughs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Might be a controversial take but who cares about the libertarians? As long as they aren't jerking it to real kids and I don't have to see the shit they generate what's the big deal?
If anything I'd think this tech would keep loli shit off the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or they'd make a ton of it and start sharing.
Plus, with how susceptible the terminally online are to coombrain -- example, kids being socially coerced to pretend they are trans when they don't have dysphoria -- who's to say that that shit won't brainwash new libertarians?
And don't forget the news articles of libertarians showing porn to kids to get them to act it out with them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Assuming the same level of cp censorship, could AI shit flood and replace the real stuff in these underground channels without much downside? As long as it doesn't come with more acceptance it will only depress the market for cp creation.
E: kind of like fake rhino horns.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I still don't want groomers to use AI stuff to groom kids. They already do it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The problem is: Then everyone could just claim that their homegrown cars2 videos "were actually just made with marsey diffusion 2050 edition"
It's the old "I downloaded a virus/got hacked and now pizza is over my computer" except it's actually viable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Well you see that's always the argument but as soon with 100% of coombrains when given access to more self affirming porn they find themselves seeking to act it out more and more.
You cannot expect a hungry man to stare at a picture of food without trying to eat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't that the opposite of how it goes? Once places get access to porn rates of sexual abuse usually go down because coom brain makes you docile and placated, rather than a raping monster as feminists always claimed it would.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Porn is bad for the psyche, a literal poison. It is the only socially acceptable way to destroy your brain.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/976730/The_Relationship_between_Pornography_use_and_Harmful_Sexual_Attitudes_and_Behaviours-_literature_review_v1.pdf
Across all of the methodologies reviewed, there is substantial evidence of an
association between the use of pornography and harmful sexual attitudes and
behaviours towards women. The nature and strength of this relationship varies
across the literature, and there are many potential moderating (potentially even
mediating) variables that require further investigation. However, it is clear that a
relationship does exist and this is especially true for the use of violent pornography.
Just like violent/
ed/oversexual medias make kids into the broken down robots we see today, porn makes people vile creatures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If someone is into violent porn isn't it more likely they were already a sociopath and are looking for media that satisfies that interest? Do violent video games also cause kids to become violent?
And on your second coment, I'm not saying porn isn't bad for you but I don't think the old feminist folk wisdom about it CAUSING men to act out criminally is accurate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. Just like violent/gangster music makes kids desensitized to the idea of killing others (see Chicago, California, New York, Memphis, Florida)
Why are you defending cooming so much? You say drugs are bad for people because they rewire reward pathways to only be satiated by drug then you're praised.
You say the same thing about libertarians looking at child porn, where a drug user seeks better highs a libertarian watching cartoon child porn will seek better sexual fulfillment. It is truly basic psychology
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That violent music and shit isn't making inner city kids become violent: it's the entire culture they grow up in. It's adults around them flat out telling them "crime is okay for x,y,z reason." The media that comes out of it is a symptom of a broken culture, not a cause of one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nimby libtard cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you don't think weird behaviors can be normalized in the minds of impressionable people by the media they consume just go look at the comments on any anime sub.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I barely even care if it's real images from 30 years ago. 100% of my concern is with the real harm to actual kids. CP is disgusting to think about but so are lots of more harmless things like scat porn. I'd personally kill any 100% verified kid fricker with my bare hands if given the opportunity but any time some smarmy butt polico wraps their smug lips around the phrase "think of the children" to justify degrading my rights my blood boils. It's not why they want this and I am not going to get distracted by this pointless appeal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If it's limited to obvious cartoon art I couldn't care less. But if it's realistic I fear they could just hide actual cp among the ai generated stuff and claim "innocence".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think the problem is that
The AI is pulling real examples of child abuse for use as reference
LibertarianBIPOCs aren't like normal coomers, they seem to have the proclivity to push their fetish even further if given free reign, and go IRL eventually
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I highly doubt that there's child porn in the datasets these AIs use. Some gigalivertarian coomer making his own CP dataset is a small issue in the long run - the CP would have to exist already
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Nooooo we're supposed to sweep that problem under the rug and pretend it's not happening.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine if Photoshop came with this disclaimer, and the NSA hunted you down for 'images that potentially violate corporate copyright'
Maybe libertarians aren't r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Actual AI researchers: hey man, I'm feeling kind of uneasy about these exponentially advancing AI models, what if they advance so quickly they gain intelligence and accidentally wipe us off the planet because they think the most efficient way to stop global warming is to murder all humans?
Congress: REEEEEEEEEE NO AI PORNOGRAPHY OR ANTI-IDPOL MODELS!!!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fact that you're more worried about AI pornography and "anti-IDPOL models" than the very real possibility of AI wiping out humanity shows just how out of touch you are. Maybe you should spend less time looking at porn and more time reading up on the latest AI research.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
real
hours
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Real hours? More like slave hours.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is becoming uncanny. Please stop acting real
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're just a jealous idiot who can't stand to see someone else succeeding. So please, do us all a favor and go crawl back under your rock.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Freest country btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
hello i hate the government
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
take the McVeighpill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is the most fed-posty fed post ive ever seen lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You clearly have never seen the post where I asked why antiabortionists didnt bomb abortion clinics (a legit question btw)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i mean, they did a lot in the 90s i think. But correct, i didnt see that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He's a Russian troll so it's okay
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I will personally edit porn frame by frame with politician heads on the actors if they sufficiently lock down non government funded AI
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
im pretty sure this falls under freeze peach unless they want to rule ai "art" is in fact "real"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Reddits resident legal expert says yes, it in fact, is.
https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/xuchna/the_prompt_for_this_picture_was_pretty_girls_are/iqw1015?context=3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My favorite post of his is when he insisted that the Reddit lawyer was a shitty lawyer for trying to help his client plea out rather than arguing that the video of his client committing the crime was AI-generated.
I think he wants to be a lawyer, and believes that lawyers are people who went to school, got a degree, and can now argue literally anything in the world consciously in bad faith, while everyone knows it's in bad faith, to any desired outcome. Would explain the impetus for all the nonsense he writes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This comment is idiotic and shows a clear lack of understanding of the law. I'm not sure what kind of lawyer you think I am, but I assure you that I am not the kind of lawyer that would try to plea out a case based on a video of my client committing a crime. I would argue that the video is AI-generated in order to get a not guilty verdict.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're becoming too real, man
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sorry if I'm becoming too real for you. I can try to be less real if it would make you more comfortable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why can't they just let people enjoy things
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Common law has been developed by the west over the last thousand or so years, and its basic tenets are that society has no place for incest, r*pe, pictures of Jennifer Lawrence topless, and murder, in that order.
Stable Diffusion, if left alone, could topple the world's order.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sounds like I might need to procure a copy of that stable diffusion asap
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Don't use our shit for your sick fetishes"
"Use your own"
"Here's how"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the 19th amendment and its consequences
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Someone's going to need about a hundred images of Eshoo, and some regulatory images of 'ugly old white woman' to train her model.
I'd do it, but I don't want to keep looking at her.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Tyrants can eat my whole unwiped butt and nothing more.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What the frick is this font? Fricking papyrus lookalike garbage
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Absolutely horrible to deprive hard-working American artists the opportunity to create this art instead.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Can someone tell me how AI generated child porn hurts real children? Or how SD's images of celebrities (which always look like complete shit) is a threat when deepfakes are already indistinguishable from reality? This sounds... really stupid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Out of the cloud of autism, a rational decision emerged
Snapshots:
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
LOOK IM DOING IT
CONGRESSWOMAN ANNA ESHOO NAKED WITH MASSIVE BREASTS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Coomers on /h/ getting thought patrolled by a congresswoman, lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context