](/images/16648141766588044.webp)
Following the open-source release of Stable Diffusion, photos of violently beaten Asian women generated by Stable Diffusion were posted in online chat rooms. Reports also indicate that several 4chan threads have been dedicated to Stable Diffusion-generated pornography, some of which portray real people. In a message posted to users of the Stable Diffusion Groomercord, Stability AI Founder and CEO Emad Mostaque said to Stable Diffusion users, “If you want to make NSFW [Not Suitable for Work] or offensive things make it on your own GPUs when the model is released.” Mr. Mostaque then went on to tell users which GPUs were compatible with its model for the sake of using it to generate illicit content , content Mr. Mostaque knew or should have known would likely include illegal content.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Libertarians are definitely a concern. Dual-use is also a legit argument, like how Saddam Hussein was using PS2 chips in guidance systems for SCUDs, which is why Apple includes wording about not using their product for nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Man this cracks me up. Imagine reading terms of service and you come by "You are forbidden from using this product for terroristic or otherwise harmful purposes", like a terrorist would care.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are certain federal "personal reliability program" forms that ask you if you have ever planned, or are currently planning to overthrow the United Statesnor commit acts of terror.
Like some r-slur is going to turn in a piece of paper with "yes" scribbled out and then writes in "no" below it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Law is so r-slurred sometimes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Makes me wonder if they do that to have the additional "falsification of a federal document" on the list of charges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That is exactly why they do that. It also allows them to fire you expeditiously even with union agreements and similar.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
bingo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Has any Chad ever said yes?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i guarantee people say yes to this periodically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
idk probably gets you a free swatting, and I heard you can turn those into a free $100k pretty easily
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Those sections on the SF86 are actually used pretty regularly. Former terrorists can still get security clearances as long as they disclose they're former status and stuff. It comes up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd doubt a former terrorist gets adjudicated for SI-TK
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IDK, I've seen a former terrorist get a generic Secret
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When I was applying for a visa waiver to enter the US one of the questions was if I was or had ever been involved in terrorist activity. Was almost tempted to put in yes, just for the laughs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Might be a controversial take but who cares about the libertarians? As long as they aren't jerking it to real kids and I don't have to see the shit they generate what's the big deal?
If anything I'd think this tech would keep loli shit off the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or they'd make a ton of it and start sharing.
Plus, with how susceptible the terminally online are to coombrain -- example, kids being socially coerced to pretend they are trans when they don't have dysphoria -- who's to say that that shit won't brainwash new libertarians?
And don't forget the news articles of libertarians showing porn to kids to get them to act it out with them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Assuming the same level of cp censorship, could AI shit flood and replace the real stuff in these underground channels without much downside? As long as it doesn't come with more acceptance it will only depress the market for cp creation.
E: kind of like fake rhino horns.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I still don't want groomers to use AI stuff to groom kids. They already do it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The problem is: Then everyone could just claim that their homegrown cars2 videos "were actually just made with marsey diffusion 2050 edition"
It's the old "I downloaded a virus/got hacked and now pizza is over my computer" except it's actually viable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Well you see that's always the argument but as soon with 100% of coombrains when given access to more self affirming porn they find themselves seeking to act it out more and more.
You cannot expect a hungry man to stare at a picture of food without trying to eat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't that the opposite of how it goes? Once places get access to porn rates of sexual abuse usually go down because coom brain makes you docile and placated, rather than a raping monster as feminists always claimed it would.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Porn is bad for the psyche, a literal poison. It is the only socially acceptable way to destroy your brain.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/976730/The_Relationship_between_Pornography_use_and_Harmful_Sexual_Attitudes_and_Behaviours-_literature_review_v1.pdf
Across all of the methodologies reviewed, there is substantial evidence of an
association between the use of pornography and harmful sexual attitudes and
behaviours towards women. The nature and strength of this relationship varies
across the literature, and there are many potential moderating (potentially even
mediating) variables that require further investigation. However, it is clear that a
relationship does exist and this is especially true for the use of violent pornography.
Just like violent/
ed/oversexual medias make kids into the broken down robots we see today, porn makes people vile creatures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If someone is into violent porn isn't it more likely they were already a sociopath and are looking for media that satisfies that interest? Do violent video games also cause kids to become violent?
And on your second coment, I'm not saying porn isn't bad for you but I don't think the old feminist folk wisdom about it CAUSING men to act out criminally is accurate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. Just like violent/gangster music makes kids desensitized to the idea of killing others (see Chicago, California, New York, Memphis, Florida)
Why are you defending cooming so much? You say drugs are bad for people because they rewire reward pathways to only be satiated by drug then you're praised.
You say the same thing about libertarians looking at child porn, where a drug user seeks better highs a libertarian watching cartoon child porn will seek better sexual fulfillment. It is truly basic psychology
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That violent music and shit isn't making inner city kids become violent: it's the entire culture they grow up in. It's adults around them flat out telling them "crime is okay for x,y,z reason." The media that comes out of it is a symptom of a broken culture, not a cause of one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nimby libtard cope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you don't think weird behaviors can be normalized in the minds of impressionable people by the media they consume just go look at the comments on any anime sub.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I barely even care if it's real images from 30 years ago. 100% of my concern is with the real harm to actual kids. CP is disgusting to think about but so are lots of more harmless things like scat porn. I'd personally kill any 100% verified kid fricker with my bare hands if given the opportunity but any time some smarmy butt polico wraps their smug lips around the phrase "think of the children" to justify degrading my rights my blood boils. It's not why they want this and I am not going to get distracted by this pointless appeal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If it's limited to obvious cartoon art I couldn't care less. But if it's realistic I fear they could just hide actual cp among the ai generated stuff and claim "innocence".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think the problem is that
The AI is pulling real examples of child abuse for use as reference
LibertarianBIPOCs aren't like normal coomers, they seem to have the proclivity to push their fetish even further if given free reign, and go IRL eventually
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I highly doubt that there's child porn in the datasets these AIs use. Some gigalivertarian coomer making his own CP dataset is a small issue in the long run - the CP would have to exist already
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Nooooo we're supposed to sweep that problem under the rug and pretend it's not happening.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context