Google's product designers should talk to my unhoused friends.
— Chad Loder (@chadloder) October 6, 2022
When you require a mobile phone number for authentication, you guarantee that unhoused people will permanently lose access to their email when their phone is lost, stolen or destroyed (roughly every 12 weeks).
Orange Site:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, let’s throw out all security mechanisms just so some homeless people can access their very important email accounts
We wouldn’t want them to miss a super important email like their nonexistent utility bills or something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or their government program information
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The ones they can't use because they're crackheads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The machine should give me a manual override. It is my slave, nothing more. I know what I'm doing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Which is funny you mention because Google actually does have that functionality. It allows you to generate a group of one-time passwords just for occasions like the one the OP is talking about. They're just r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The thing is, there are already open OTP standards, if I were forced to use these I wouldn't be so mad, it would be more akin being forced to create obnoxious passwords because some r-slurs are like @MyPasswordwas12345678 but unironically. Banks are especially r-slurred with this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
frick you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context