:marseyabandoned: Gmail 2FA causes the homeless to permanently lose access 3 times a year :!marseystinky:

https://x.com/chadloder/status/1577880638044020736

Orange Site:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33120534

@911roofer

103
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chad Loder is a known s*x pest.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every fricking time. Please spill the deets.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Garden variety male feminist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok, but I want to hear the stories of his s*x pesting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bless

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nobody is forcing you to use gmail you pretentious cute twink

unhoused

:#marseyeyeroll:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Now that unhoused and houseless are becoming more mainstream I am curious what the next nomenclature will be once unhoused and houseless become problematic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They've started saying "people experiencing homelessness" in my country now. I find it funny because it sounds like all the junkies are just experimenting with cool new lifestyle choices

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Exploring is even worse lmao. Makes it sound fully voluntary

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bums are treated so well in CA that many of them are.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For most of them it's 100% voluntary. They could have a roof over their head if they'd just stop doing drugs for a couple weeks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Magellan didn't have a safe place to stay in the Pacific so it's basically the same thing really.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao. I get that people should be treated with dignity (except carp) but the never-ending quest to find a "good" word to describe something that is intrinsically not good never ceases to amuse me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Over here we have, in a literal translation, "people in a street situation".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like a stevie wonder song.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"People experiencing heroin addiction-induced dermal necrosis" just sounds so much nicer than "rotten needlefreak"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People of tent.

People of drugs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People just straight up sleep on the streets with no tents or blankets or anything in portland. It doesnt look very comfortable yet they appear to sleep soundly enough.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Confort is irrelevant if youre nodding off on fent laced heroin. Those guys cant even feel the concrete

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Those systematically deprived of housing"


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Housecels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seething over roofchads

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At first i was thinking unhoused is r-slurred, but this thread explains the difference https://x.com/tyrsalvia/status/1577905797987721216?s=20&t=5MA5J7i612c1EsNCKmPojA

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That’s not how the English language works though, words don’t have to have direct translations of the subparts of words itself to have meaning.

We know what homeless means, and it can mean living in shelters, couch surfing, halfway houses, or being generally itinerant, or it could also mean living in an actual tent or on the street. Sometimes it just means a poor junkie or pan handler who may share public housing for free with 2 other junkies, sleeping in a bed every night.

All of those things can still be called homeless and people will get it.

They only care about this sort of literal translations and ignoring context thing when they want to be offended or do slacktivism, while they simultaneously use thousands of other words with multiple meanings and long ago lost literal one-to-one translations.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i agree overall with what you're saying, but in this case the word unhoused makes a difference. like for example, a homeless person has a physical address for mail (even though it might be a friends house or a shelter) but an unhoused person cant receive mail because they dont have an address

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

huh? You don't need an entirely new word to remove ANY possible lack of clarity. if the context you describe is important, all you have to say is "XXXX PERSON is homeless and they can't recieve mail". stop inventing stupid words and also stop being fat

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am. Use gmail or I'll come to your house and stomp you to death.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>my unhoused friends

Are they really your friends if you leave them to sleep on the streets?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's lying for clout. No one hangs around with hobos except other hobos, drug dealers, and grifters in the homeless NGO complex.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah couch surfers have gotten a lot more numerous the past two years. The cute twink variety moreso than the person of fent variety.

More “normal” adults than ever don’t own or directly rent a space of their own.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they are drug addicts they WILL steal from you. You can pity them and still call them your friend as it's the drug acting, no them, but letting them sleep in your home would still be untenable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, let’s throw out all security mechanisms just so some homeless people can access their very important email accounts

We wouldn’t want them to miss a super important email like their nonexistent utility bills or something

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or their government program information

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The ones they can't use because they're crackheads


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>security

The machine should give me a manual override. It is my slave, nothing more. I know what I'm doing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Which is funny you mention because Google actually does have that functionality. It allows you to generate a group of one-time passwords just for occasions like the one the OP is talking about. They're just r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The thing is, there are already open OTP standards, if I were forced to use these I wouldn't be so mad, it would be more akin being forced to create obnoxious passwords because some r-slurs are like @MyPasswordwas12345678 but unironically. Banks are especially r-slurred with this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

frick you

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd also like gmail to get rid of 2FA so I can make more sockpuppet accounts and use them for nefarious purposes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@TariqNasheed please make 2FA mandatory so that hobos can't use the internet.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thanks for your thoughts! We'll be sure to take them into consideration when making future decisions about the security of our website.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just turn it off? I can disable 2FA in my google account page

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think google has been experimenting with mandatory 2FA, but I'm pretty sure you can use phone #, other email, or a 2FA app just like you always could.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they do that how will I be able to make dozens of groomercord accounts for trolling?

Think I'm with the homeless on this on tbh.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if only email existed outside of google :marseysigh:. It's over troll bros


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

.xyz domains are like 10 bucks a year, stop being a poorcel and host your own email

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember this happening before, some sneed was sneeded about people not able to access their gmail at libraries. mainly people's pensions/healtcare was dependant on it I think. There was an open letter google doc as far as I remember

edit found it https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f6HPQbUjslcbjVHkJkAgYmQmBV3PRRHEcx4WL5rxuE8/preview

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah the lefts old 'let's design society around a negligible fraction of society'

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It’s the most annoying part of shitlib policies: Perpetually catering to the lowest common denominator, bringing everyone else down in the process.

:marseysigh#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've got about 30 unhoused neighbors whom I regularly communicate with.

Is there a cult leader Marsey yet? Like lmao what the frick.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lord of the hobos

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fascinating. how many of them are tweakers who were going to forget the password

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are the homeless more important than the elderly? From my experience, boomer tards and older are the ones who most often lose access to email accounts because they thought 2FA was necessary, didn't know to deactivate it prior to switching phone numbers, or didn't have the knowledge to go shopping around for non-2FA email providers before problems emerge. Young homeless have no excuse for boomer-tier r-sluration.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah yes when you tweak out so hard you smash or lose your phone 4 times a year regularly. How could Big Tech do this??

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even the homeless have phones now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How the frick do you lose get stolen or destroy a phone every twelve weeks Ive had the same one since 2019 and its god darn pristine

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unhoused people tend to get their phones through the "Obamaphone" program, which means that replacing a lost or stolen phone results in a completely new phone number.

Not a single one has been able to keep the same cell phone number for more than 4 months at a time. It's usually 4 weeks or less.

Interesting. So the US taxpayers subsidize a new phone every month to the homeless. And I somehow doubt that anyone steals them, or else everyone and their uncle would have an obamaphone by now, so they just keep destroying or losing them, and get them replaced for free. This is a very interesting statistic!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh no, let's stop ALL security measures because 0.01 percent of the population might be inconvenienced! Obviously it's worth inconveniencing 99.99% of the population for that 0.01%!

Then as a follow up, we can force women to allow trans people into their sports teams, because obviously if it's worth inconveniencing 99.99% of the population for a small minority, then it's also worth harming 51% of the population for an even smaller minority. That's just logic, chud!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

phone is lost, stolen or destroyed (roughly every 12 weeks).

thank u government very cool

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i have no idea who that is, but they've blocked me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Use a different email provider then lmfao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why she left you you fricking cuck

Snapshots:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33120534:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.