No wonder Twitter never made any money. Why on earth would they need a climate change division?

This does not bode well for the Twitter Remote Viewers Division.

It's real, but not the end of the world.

Also, not a single environmentalist that opposes nuclear power wants to fix it.

Climate Change is real and we must accelerate it to force the planet towards a worldwide communist revolution.

/r/carbonmaxxing

It's real and it's going to frick us hard, but it's pretty much impossible to predict when or how bad it will be. Forecasting anything 30+ years into the future is less science and more wild guessing. There are simply too many variables to account for and very small changes in the initial conditions vastly change the outcome.

Like for one example 20 years ago they put up signs at Glacier National Park basically saying that by 2020 the glaciers won't exist anymore because of climate change. They weren't wrong that the glaciers there are going to disappear, they certainly are, it's just impossible to predict when that will be.

I am not going to sacrifice my and my community's well-being so that a bunch of africans and s can make up the difference with exponential population growth and complete stagnation of efficient technology.

If all those whiny trust fund kids wanted to make a change they would have studied physics and thermodynamics and worked to develop technologies that can be implemented in developing nations instead of just whining about Steve Q. Everybody driving his car to work while leeching money off corporations putting up the façade that they care.

As for the radical centrist part, once climate change actually starts it'll cull the most inefficient producers first (costal developing populations) so might as well accelerate.

>I don't care, turn up the AC dear

There's no way humanity would go extinct because we are the chosen species

Build the sunshade at the Sun-Earth L1 point

Climate change is real, it may suck, but I don’t care because I’ll be dead before it matters.

Climate change is real and we should do our part to reduce our emissions and waste by forcing obese people into hamster wheels and using them as a source of renewable energy.

Environmentalists would gain more traction with normal people if they just said, "look, don't you want to live in a world with clean-smelling air and trees and stuff instead of these Dark Satanic Mills?" Appeal to peoples' sense of comfort and aesthetics. No one really dislikes trees, not even the chuddiest of chuds.

Instead they browbeat people about the literally imperceptible rise in a transparent gas that somehow lets sunlight in but not back out. A problem that can't be solved as long as China remains uncooperative (and they always will be).

They also fricked up by choosing a spokesperson who looks like the trolls from David The Gnome and Harriet The Spy had a baby and peed on it.

Longer summer=more time for grilling

Whatever this guy says when he's not sneeding about homeless people

https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD

Considering the range of human habitation right now we'll adapt in a very broad range of climatic conditions, beyond routine fluctuations like the current one.

Desert bedouin trans lives matter

Absolutely real, but clearly massively overblown. Taken over by a shitload of grifters.

Realised this when they said "we got 3 years left until its too late" for the past decade, and also going "oh, we stopped/reversed something that was happening because of climate change? This is proof that it's even worse than we thought".

Climate change (Global Warming) is real and true.

Its never going to get fixed because its an issue for corporations and states to resolve.

They are busy passing laws to try and make you drink from paper straws instead.

It's real and it is gonna cause major global upheavel like we havent seen since the industrial revolution (unbased and cringe).

But we're not gonna stop it, not only because only the west cares about it while being too small to prevent it, but also the only way to actually prevent it is to go back to pre-industrial society and technology (based and epic). But that would cause at least as much, if not more, upheavel than global warming.

In the end, we should try to minimise it, but more than anything we need to prepare for the consequences and mentally be ready for uncomfortable decisions and a life less luxurious than our current.We have to be prepared for mass refugees on a level that the west quite literally wouldnt be able to feed, we will see entire regions devolve into war and anarchy (middle east), most likely nuclear war between minor powers (certainly SA vs Iran; probably india vs paki, also likely israel at some point).In the west we will lose many luxuries because we have to be more self-sufficient and cant let chingchongs, sexy Indian dudes, and slant-eyes manufacture it for us. Food diversity will drastically go down, caloric intake as well (though i dont see caloric starvation), meat will go back to being a "rarity" - meaning maybe once a day instead of every meal. Extreme weather will be a common occurence we have to adapt to: tornadoes, flooding, snow storms, draughts will happen every year, and our society has to adapt to it and accept that people will die more often.

>what's the radical centrist rdrama approved opinion on Climate Change?

Hoxhaism-Posadism. We build lots of bunkers for us to hide in and then nuke the ozone layer to kill Putler before the aliens arrive.

Climate change is real.

And I simply don't care.

I say let the earth warm up, we'll grow oranges in Alaska

It's real and it should be accelerated for maximim drama

Real, but so long term that we'll deal with it effectively through technological advancement at the current course. The status quo is good enough to combat it.

Carbon tax OK (personally not a fan of this at the current stage)

Genocide is the only solution.

It's going to make my property in curious cGo more valuable because it's well above sea level, will remain arable land and has plenty of access to fresh water. For that reason I am pro-climate change.

It's real and it will end the world and that's why it's a good thing.

It’s real and a good thing because it’ll flood the bad places

We have plans to create an atmosphere on Mars, so we can just do the same here. Science nerds win again

It's real. At an individual level you can do nothing to change the planet's global signature. You can however at best try to plant a few seeds or plants or something to feel better and it may help at a local level. However, long term it's an r-slured idea to expect 8 billion people to be on the exact same page, if they could do that we wouldn't need government, so it makes logical sense to actually have the corporations go green on their end as they are to primary producers of greenhouse gases anyways.

Nobody knows how to fix it, what exactly causes it, how effective our measures are let alone whether they do what we want them to do. It's an excuse not to look at the much simpler geopolitical issues such as world hunger, middle east conflict, the utter shitshow that is most african countries etcetc.

http://davidpratt.info/climcat.htm

Give this a read

It's real. But nothing you do will change anything. Nothing a single nation (or small group of nations) can do will change anything. Same applies to companies.

The underlying problem is overpopulation. Doesn't matter if you cut everyone's carbon emission to half. As soon as we double the population we are back to where we are.
To battle climate change you have to kill billions of people.

The Russians are building icebreakers and expect the arctic to support shipping lanes in the foreseeable future.

There’s a lot of sustainability and ecological problems that aren’t really climate change per se, but carry similar overtones, for example industrial agriculture in places like Saudi Arabia operates off fossil water, which will likely run out on relevant timescales.

Change it as much as we can without regard to consequences