Those FRICKING monkeys stole your stuff! Get it back!
(Also, remember to leave a comment if you did something interesting )
Those FRICKING monkeys stole your stuff! Get it back!
(Also, remember to leave a comment if you did something interesting )
Now playing: Title Theme (Diddy Kong Racing).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the above has two main sources of bloat: writing out the parser instead of just doing 'eval("old => " + op)' bc eval BAD and actually parsing with a big regex instead of just a.split('\n')[3].slice(5) or whatever
why do they need to create retarded narratives? it's just a 'throwing numbers around in a datastructure problem' that has nothing to do with monkeys. they've all been very boring so far, hopefully it'll get better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is just a dumb brute force solution that's been written out in the most boring way possible. It's not even close to the best solution and it's just a waste of time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
hey @bbbb what's the big(O) of @ejrqiowae89q8h9 's solution?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hey you, what's the big deal with your solution? It's O(1), which is obviously not as good as my solution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
darn @bbbb has got solutions faster than O(1)?!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, well I'm not fricking O(1), so get used to it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
who r u fricking @bbbb?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm fricking you, you fricking idiot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
darn really? shit i almost forgot. don't worry, i'll hit u back later @bbbb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That was a mistake. You're about to find out the hard way why.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context