Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • JimothyX5 : Stupid, unfunny and completely unrelated to drama

:marseynerd: Am I an acceptable poster for theMotte.org? [-17 votes, 34 replies]

https://www.themotte.org/post/310/am-i-an-acceptable-poster-for

Hi, I'm a long time reader of Slate Star Codex and I used to post on the Reddit forum until I got banned. There are a few reasons that I believe I got banned.

  1. Uncharitably claiming that Leftist censorship was a threat to the rationalist community

  2. Advocating for violence

  3. Not being kind

I understand why all of these things could have been a problem on the Reddit community, but I would like to know if they're still going to be a problem here, since I don't want to invest a lot of time creating a profile and having good-faith discussions with people if I'm only going to be banned again. Here are the reasons that I think these three issues shouldn't be a problem anymore.

  1. I was right, and everybody who disagreed with me was wrong. The fact that the community had to move here proves it. I'm not expecting an apology but I think that time has proven me correct on that score.

  2. Violence is a completely justifiable response to tyranny. While calls to violence may be against Reddit rules (and the community was right to ban me from Reddit because my rhetoric could have caused problems for the mods) there are no such rules here. In fact, rdrama (which helped set up this offsite community, and whom you should all be grateful to) actively encourages calls to violence. If a rational and logical case can be made for violence then I think there is no good reason not to hear that case out. If you're forced to censor people you disagree with because you're unable to make a stronger case for pacifism over violence in the open marketplace of ideas, then you should question whether your pacifism is actually a worthwhile philosophy.

  3. Kindness and truth are different terminal values. If you optimize for kindness then it is self-evident that you will have to sacrifice truth at some point. Obviously the Reddit community has chosen kindness as its terminal value, but I'm hoping that this offsite community is enlightened enough to choose truth.

I'm linking to a few articles from my Substack here so you have a few examples of my style of writing and can make a better judgement about whether I would be a good fit for the offsite community. I'm also on rdrama where my username is sirpingsalot. If you think I'm not a good fit for the offsite either, then no hard feelings - I'm happy to take my ideas to more sympathetic communities instead. I just don't want to put in the effort of investing time and energy here if I'm only going to get banned again for the same reasons.

70
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysquint:

Wait a minute I recognize that username

He’s one of us isn’t he

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If he's a legit longposter he must be disowned.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He does write entire paragraphs about how he's justified to act violently against people who he perceives to have wronged him.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not true: I feel that everybody is justified to act violently against people who have wronged them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyfedposthmmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybased:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagree:

What a waste of good internet, why use all those words when "Because I enjoy it" rolls so readily off the keyboard.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He has an incredibly inflated ego, genuinely believes himself to be the smartest and most correct person in any room he enters and he needs you to know it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What an idiot. Everyone knows that I'm the smartest and most correct person in any room I enter.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Uhm, excuse you? How can you claim that when I'M right here???

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyno:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sirpingsalot is our best poster. Everything he says is just batshit insane, contrarian, and hilarious.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a natural consequence of woke culture. Everybody is trained to think of themselves as the biggest victim, and the Democrats have to try and pacify all of them by stroking their egos. But from a reality-based perspective, there can only be one biggest victim, and since Leftoid ideology claims objective facts are "racist," it's entirely subjective... which means that when different identity groups claim victimhood, the only way to resolve it is to fight it out.

All incoherent ideologies eventually run into this problem. That's why, when somebody like me creates a completely coherent ideological framework, it tends to spread very fast. For a budding demagogue, the quickest way to politically destroy your enemies is to point out inconsistancies in their worldview, and mine has no inconsistancies.

https://rdrama.net/post/129757/the-whites-have-noticed-that-the/3206467?context=8#context

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sirpingsalot is our worst poster. Everything he says is just smug, boring, and unfunny.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is his wife still plotting to kill him?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I divorced her

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseykneel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That doesn't answer the question.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was a stupid question

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could you answer in more words to prove you'd actually make a good themotte poster?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OK, I feel this question is in bad faith and doesn't live up to Scott Alexander's standards of "be charitable." For example, if you wanted to steelman the proposition, you would say "Isn't it unreasonable to think that your wife is trying to kill you?" Instead it was delivered in a very sarcastic way implying that the poster was wrong. As Eliezar Yudkowsky postulated on LessWrong in the Parable of the Splinks (LessWrong Chapter 9 Link 12) the Blue Splink could have learned a lot from the Red Splink if the Blue Splink had just been willing to consider the fact that maybe what both Splinks thought was a rock was actually a Violet Splink. That's why I feel that the poster should be given a 48 hour time out until he's willing to come back and post with less heat, more light.

:#marseyreading::#marseyakshually:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So dreamy :marseyhearts:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Inshallah :marseyinshallah:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@sirpingsalot is our resident psychopath

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sociopath, not psychopath. It's an important difference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hard to say

He sounds like he might actually take us seriously

But then, I might just be taking him too seriously

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I only take myself seriously, and even then only about half the time

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well spoken king. Humility rules:marseypoor:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.