Unable to load image

Driverless carpocalypse put on hold by California DMV following pedestrian being mowed down and an alleged cover-up

https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/cruise-driverless-permits-suspended-dmv-18445296.php

:#soyjackwow: JUST LIKE MY SOYBERPUNKS!!!

In that crash, which occurred around 9:30 p.m. near the intersection of 5th and Market streets, an unrelated car struck a pedestrian, knocking them into the path of a driverless Cruise car, according to the DMV. The autonomous vehicle braked hard, but still collided with and ran over the pedestrian before coming to a complete stop. Cruise representatives met with officials from both the DMV and California Highway Patrol to discuss the collision, according to the DMV. During the meeting, Cruise employees allegedly played footage from the car's onboard cameras, which ended once the car came to a stop.

But DMV officials said they later learned there was more to the story, and requested additional footage from Cruise, which the company sent 10 days after the initial meeting. The extended footage showed that, after the initial stop, the car then resumed driving and attempted a “pullover maneuver,” traveling about 20 feet while the pedestrian was still caught under the vehicle, according to the DMV.

“Cruise failed to disclose that the AV executed a pullover manuever that increased the risk of, and may have caused, further injury to a pedestrian,” the DMV wrote in a report justifying the suspensions. “Cruise's omission hinders the ability of the department to effectively and timely evaluate the safe operation of Cruise's vehicles and puts the safety of the public at risk.”


LATEST, Oct. 24, 2:25 p.m. The California Department of Motor Vehicles has suspended Cruise's permits to deploy driverless vehicles as commercial taxis in the state, or run any tests on public streets without backup drivers behind the wheel. Tuesday's orders, obtained by SFGATE, blame the suspension on employees of the San Francisco-based firm hiding the full story behind a crash that reportedly left a pedestrian severely injured on Oct. 2 in San Francisco.

30
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I only follow self driving casually, and it's truly remarkable how far GM's attempt seems to be behind Google's in the form of Waymo. If I was selecting who to drive with, it'd be a no brainer. It just seems like Google is really bad at managing Waymo; I mean they have 2 (two, 1+1) CEOs

Wait what.. they have two? Like two times one = two?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's true, one is a vatnik and the other is a BIPOC. Diversity!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitri_Dolgov

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekedra_Mawakana

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That poor Russian, having a work wife at extremely high stakes and public visibility

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What the heck?

rom my perspective as a person who lives in San Francisco and also drives a LOT (10-20k miles per year, and many small drives within the city): Cruise cars do not perform acceptably.

They manage to avoid collisions by driving extremely conservatively, but the way they traverse, say, a left turn against traffic is absurd. They slow everyone down, including emergency vehicles and public transit, by performing far below the level of most Human drives.

They don't work in the rain, they can't handle construction, they block garages and driveways.

Waymo vehicles are objectively far better. They drive like Humans do. Still some issued with weather and construction, but they work well alongside busses, trucks, and private cars without slowing anyone down.

>Cruise cars do not perform acceptably.

>Waymo vehicles are objectively far better. They drive like Humans do.

I had no idea actual driverless cars have been deployed already

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Waymo has been driving around the Bay Area for almost 10 years, I don't know how long cruise has been doing it but I think it's about 5 years? I agree with the commenter that Waymo has been consistently the best self driving car company. No fatalities so far and very few crashes. For the most part this is because they were very conservative in their rollout, they spent 4ish years with cars rolling around city streets capped at 30 mph with drivers who could take control. Then as they expanded test cars they kept drivers who could overrule the car for a long time whenever they expanded somewhere new. I think they only rolled out fully driverless cars in the last year or so in SF, which they've been in for 5 years already.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They've been driving around for a little while now. Fewer problems with sabotage than I was expecting.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/reporter-rides-cruise-waymo-here-s-went-18304701.php

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>carpocalypse

:marseyschizotwitch:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1707881499271494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101210991135056.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:carpcryinggenocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Alternatively

:#carpdark:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What? General Motors fricking things up? I'm shocked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It roomba'd him :#marseyxd::#marseypojom:


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

░░░░░░▄▄▄░░▄██▄
░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄
░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄
░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀
░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀
░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀
▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀U HAVE BEEN SPOOKED BY THE
▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀
░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄
░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄
░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄SPOOKY SKELETON
░░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌
░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░▐▌SEND THIS TO 7 PPL OR SKELETONS WILL EAT YOU

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.