Unable to load image

Linux 6.7 is out. Bcachefs now in mainline :marseyletsfuckinggo2: :marseypenguin:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=widprp4XoHUcsDe7e16YZjLYJWra-dK0hE1MnfPMf6C3Q@mail.gmail.com

Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

17
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's the difference between this and btrfs? One of your old posts says snapshots will scale better for multi Peta byte snapshots or whatever, but is there a difference that matters for normal usage

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Btrfs has a lot of foot guns and generally has a poor track record when it comes to not eating your data.

This ars article comparing it to ZFS is useful, while it's from 2021 the critiques are fundamental to btrfs https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/09/examining-btrfs-linuxs-perpetually-half-finished-filesystem


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

brtfs sucks at the most critical part of data storage, not destroying it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhes#right:

I use with it as “ext4++” where it's just a single disk or whatever but there's so many footguns I recommend people get invested in ZFS.


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lel. so far I havent been bitten in the butt but i gotta start creating backups

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.