TypeScript community is a bunch of toxic crybabies forged by advertisement who usualy know absolutely nothing beyond what the propaganda says or about the most basic programming concepts, and want to look like they know something. All arguments in favor of TS are always the same old fake propaganda that Microsoft was laughed about when TS was launched. TS is extremely slow and bloated, it forces stupid practices, and present no real value for any level of expertise, it's basically useless, and serves only for Microsoft to increase their market share. That's why reasonable projects are consistently abandoning it, as popularity pushed by propaganda alone has no real value.
JS is very fast, expressive and flexible enough to allow any amount of strictness you need. TS is just propaganda oriented programming that naive devs and overconfident juniors following the hype of the week use to try to look less stupid and avoid FOMO.
Every down vote here is a typetard tear falling down because they just can't reasonably defend TS.
and serves only for Microsoft to increase their market share
oh please. the "mIcrO$oft is eVol" stuff is lame and tired. it makes the rest of your arguments sound conspiratorial. what business plan entails building out an open-source language with ZERO tie back to your core offerings: Office and Azure?
it's adoption was driven largely due to Angular, not some secret "propoganda" from Microsoft (what a ridiculous word to use in this case).
Thanks for proving my point. If basic common everyday business strategy of multi billion companies sounds conspiratorial, you're the very target for my comment. Cry louder, it seemed to me that even your words were distorted by your crying. xD
If basic common everyday business strategy of multi billion companies sounds conspiratorial
sound real stupid not being able to articulate why releasing an open-source language that DOES NOT TIE TO THEIR CORE OFFERINGS is "everyday business strategy".
Cry louder, it seemed to me that even your words were distorted by your crying. xD
ur the b-word on a tirade
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This reminds me of how I felt as a perl monk while python was taking over. I already know perl by Larry Wall, why the frick should I learn perl by Fisher Price? But alas, the winds of change blow strong and my perl skills have been left to rot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the fact that perl was so unmaintainable that people left for python says a lot.
Follower of Christ
Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How much of your old code can you read? Be honest.
Also, why did they make the object system so r-slurred and slow?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can read all of it motherlover because I don't write my code like its a golf contest. Object oriented programming in perl is for strags but you can use moose if that's how you were born.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Final question:
What are your thoughts on raku?
And I use ruby so it doesn't really matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know much about it. Perl 6 looked interesting at the time, but people who use perl are interested in getting stuff done, not jerking each other off and that was a wild 10 year jerk-off session with no orgasm. I know it was spun off but its too late to care. I only use perl for some fancy command line stuff now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context