Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're just mad their shit sucks :#marseysourgrapes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagree: DeepMind are the only part of Google that's actually good at AI. They're a bunch of britbongs that used to be their own startup. Google had "Google Brain" but it was trash, so they finally shitcanned their in-house effort last year. DeepMind BTFO'd the world's greatest Go player so hard he quit playing.

Google hasn't made anything decent since gmail, but they are still smart enough to buy worthwhile companies sometimes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Demis Hassabis was fricking legendary already as a kid when he was making games. Made Evil Genius, a classic that still holds up to this day. And Republic: the Revolution that was really overambitious and probably taught him a lot about what he's saying now. Then Google threw a fortune at him to make boring shit instead.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I even saw a documentary about that but for some reason I associated it with openAI :#marseyshrug:

I was mainly talking about their Gemini launch, which was so badly received they took it down

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh yeah, Gemini blows. DeepMind has been too busy training AI to do important things like invent new medicines and win at Starcraft to bother competing in the racist SmarterChild market.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyh#esright:

Google being bested in AI is the funniest fricking outcome :marseyxd:

BTFO by MS in Cloud already and can't even make an OK chat bot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>bested

Lmbo, bested because they don't release a chatbot that would cannabilize their search business and burn cash? They 100% have better shit that just isn't user facing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tf do you mean, they were synonymous with AI/ML and then missed the biggest breakthrough that they invented: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_Is_All_You_Need

release a chatbot

they still released a chatbot that is worse than their competitor. If they pulled an Apple and (at least currently) ignored it wholesale you might have a point?

They 100% have better shit that just isn't user facing

A GPT? At this time of year, at this time of day, in Google, localized entirely within their B2B operations?

!codecels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You seem pretty r-slurred. Chatbots will be dead in a year, they are absolute trash. Only an r-slur would pay for one.

But also Gemini is comparable to anything from OpenAI. Google is not behind on anything ai related.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have never had a conversation with you where I didn't think you have a severe learning disability.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You are absolutely seething because you know you're not only wrong but r-slurred.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I could half believe that they released a deliberately shitty product to try to delegitimise the concept altogether, but then again, they were a bit late to the table for that to work

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They didn't release a good chatbot because nobody has a good chatbot. Refusing to let consumers burn their cash on asking the best version of gemini they have dumb questions isn't any inferiority to OAI.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the interface to consumers is orthogonal to them missing breakthroughs on GPT.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally :marseyme: what do you mean, is it just that they weren't the very first :marseywinner: to have it working? They've been neck and neck with foundational :marseytariq2: stuff ( :marseychinchilla: ) the whole time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The company that branded itself as the premier AI/ML company missing a breakthrough they created the foundation for is bad, yes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They didn't miss anything though? They didn't release a consumer facing product, which isn't a mistake because no one will pay for it and giving it away just burns money. You mongoloid.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.