Twitter's favorite activist :blacksoyjak: "Data Scientist" (Kareem Carr) thinks that "Python is a massive pain in the butt to install" :marseydunce:

For the uninitiatied: This is the absolute r-slur who spent weeks arguing that "2 + 2 ≠ 4"

https://www.westernjournal.com/wokeness-comes-mathematics-academics-saying-225/

He's also famous for making sophomoric ggplot charts in R to show off his "data science" chops :marseysmug2:

and going viral for bullshit like this:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1714854759537882.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17148547596839895.webp

70
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1714854759537882.webp

:#marseywtf2:

Is this BIPOC for real? It's gotta be a trolling. He's a teacher too for undergrads, right?

:marseyhmm: :marseyhmm: :marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's technically correct that there isn't enough information.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make an assumption about equally sized boxes and give an answer (51).

Even if they showed each individual box, an r-slur could say, "derrr there could be boxes inside the truck and its tires, so not enough information :marseyretard4:."

It's r-slurred nitpicking that only mathcels care about. Give them a real world problem, and they'd never solve it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>make an assumption

So you agree that he is correct? You can't answer the question without making an assumption because there isn't enough information

>equally sized boxes

This has nothing to do with it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To a degree, I agree, but that's why you state assumptions and make your conclusion in order to give an answer. That's what you have to do in the social sciences because you won't have perfect information nor will everything be tractable like the mathematicians demand (and hence can't solve real world problems).

There never will be enough information. Like Adolin mentioned, you can give a range from 31 or so to, as I said, a billion because there could be a billion little boxes hidden inside. That's another answer.

The question proposed can be answered, but he can't answer it because he's a tad r-slurred.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Each box contains another box, which contains another box, which contains another box… there infinite boxes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynerd3:

Actually, there is a limit.

:marseysmughips:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So how many boxes fit inside each other? What is the maximum nesting?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Depends on how thin the sides are and their dimensions get smaller. You see? We've already gone into the pointless part of the problem. Try being more practical, like me.

:marseyhmmhips:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

there is nothing to do with boxes inside boxes, is just that the truck could be like this, you quadruple BIPOCs @AnnoyinTheGoyim https://i.rdrama.net/images/17172668846208398.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.