Unable to load image

How dare you question anything that Apple :marseyapple: says! Ars Technica users prove once again that they're the smartest people on the Internet

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/06/apples-ai-promise-your-data-is-never-stored-or-made-accessible-by-apple/?comments=1&comments-page=1

Ars Technica have a zillion articles reporting on Apple's little event yesterday. The most interesting is "Apple's AI promise: “Your data is never stored or made accessible to Apple”. As always I don't give a shit what the article itself says so let's head straight to the comments.

It turns out the tech savvy geniuses who comment on Ars Technica articles would trust Apple with their lives, and anyone doubting Apple's security motives is torn apart.


Top comments:

Too many lies - from you and everyone else.

I'm sorry Apple, but I don't believe anyone that makes these kinds of claims... [downmarseyd to shit]

I'll be fascinated by your audit results, and am impressed at how quickly you work. [top comment]

:soycry: no you have to blindly trust Apple


This is a nice change of pace, given recent events from companies like Abode, instead of the standard

<insert accent="" here="" russian=""></insert>

In Capitalist America, corporation monetizes YOU!!

Just a reminder that Ars users believe they're the most intelligent commenters on the Internet, and even Reddit-tier comments like this don't introduce self-doubt.


Do you for a fricking second believe them? Like really? [downmarseyd to shit]

Yes, because not everything is a conspiracy.

It may turn out that Apple are wrong, but I don't believe they're lying, because that would be incredibly stupid of them. [top comment]


I tend to trust companies to act in their own enlightened self-interest. In Apple's case, that mostly means they have more to lose from a leak indicating their privacy claims are ingenuous than they have to gain from whatever they might do with people's personal data.

Yeh everyone knows that personal data isn't useful to companies :marseygigaretard:


Very curious how it's at all possible to reliably verify the code running on a remote machine. [downmarseyd to shit]

Isn't that the entire premise of Open Source? How can you reliably verify the code running anywhere? [top comment]

Suspend disbelief? That's asking a lot. We shall see… [downmarseyd to shit]

What has Apple done in the last 10 years that requires you to suspend disbelief? I haven't heard of anything that would break my trust in them. [top comment]

:marseyclapping2: TRUST :marseyclapping2: APPLE :marseyclapping2:


"You should totally believe us". [downmarseyd to shit]

Their architecture documents are public. [top comment]

Everyone knows that architecture documents are legally binding and definitely reflect what's actually running.


These guys are fricking idiots.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17220473424733703.webp

51
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyapple:

wholesome Marsey

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And it's not just :marse#y: but with an object pasted in front. It looks like an original?


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17220473424733703.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Looks AI-y like :marseygrapes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That doesn't make it unoriginal. Robots are people, too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.